Please sign the appeal to get Tony Farrell re-employed– put up by Rory Ridley-Duff on the big-hitting site www.change.org. Professor Ridley-Duff is employed by the University of Sheffield. (NB, my article about Tony Farrell, and his legal struggle)
Also if you can, contribute to the Tony Farrell Fund Appeal fund. He needs our help. continue reading…
“I have published books (in Japanese) and articles claiming that the tsunami and nuclear disaster that occurred in Fukushima, Japan on March 11, 2011, sometimes known as “3/11” was the result of a deliberate attack. My sources for this assertion and what I am about to write include Japanese military intelligence, former Prime Minister Naoto Kan (whom I have known personally for many years), members of the crew that smuggled the nuclear weapons used in the attack on Fukushima into Japan, members of both the French and British branches of the Rothschild family, senior CIA agents and a member of the team that actually drilled the nuclear weapons into the seabed before the 3/11 attack.” Benjamin Fulford, on VT
I’d like to try to give Ian Crane’s take on the Fukushima nuclear reactor explosion – which has more or less destroyed Japan as an industrial nation. It surely behoves all of us to try and grapple with this issue. Was it an Israeli false-flag attack?
Was it yet another manifestation of the Mossad motto, ‘By way of deception shall you wage war?’
Let’s recall that in London on July 7th an Israeli security firm Verint Systems had been installed on the London Underground; just as on 9/11 Israeli security firms were operating at the relevant airports in Boston and New York*.
Ian follows the startling interpretation of the event given by Jim Stone, here. As we shall see, endorsement of some elements of his story have since appeared. According to Jim Stone,
1. Japan annoys Israel:
a) 11th March 2010 – exactly one year before the event – Japan deplores Israel’s expansive plans to build upon the West Bank: ‘Japan demands that the plans should not be implemented’. ‘Demands’, eh? Did they maybe need to be taught a lesson?
b) 18 Feb 2011 Japan voted against Israel for the first time at UN, on a motion condemning Israeli West Bank settlements.
c) Feb 2010 Japan offered to enrich uranium for Iran.
2. Japan employs an Israeli security firm for its Fukushima nuclear reactor (Arava based firm called Magna BSP. Arava is a district around Dimona) QUOTE Jim Stone: “It is documented that a team from Israel, with a history consisting only of working in Israeli defense, got unlimited access to a Japanese nuclear facility, which then went boom.”
3. The Stuxnet virus arrives in Japan shortly after Magna BSP arrived. This was a Mossad/CIA creation, used to wreck Iran’s nuclear reactors in 2010. It is able to undermine liquid-flow technology, while preserving the control dials so it looks as if the system is functioning normally.
4. Israel places a rather huge ‘camera’ inside reactor number 3, over 1000 lbs in weight, but actually it was a mini-nuke.
5. An earthquake strikes Japan Mark 6.8 on the Richter scale, not 9 (i.e. a hundred times weaker, its a log scale) with an inland epicentre, at 2.48 pm. Synchronously, did the mini-nuke blow up, demolishing reactors 3 and 4 at Fukushima? The charts (shown by Jim Stone) are the records from Kurihara, about 100 km north of Fukushima.
THE EXPLOSION: “The containment walls were at their thinnest points in the lowest allowed General Electric design a minimum of 4 foot thick steel reinforced concrete, were likely to be a minimum of 8 feet thick, and were totally blown away. All concrete was stripped from the rebar, which was left dangling. Reactor 3 vanished entirely,as seen in the classified photo used to compare the destruction to the diagram and reactor 4 appears to have been blown to pieces as seen in this classified photo The yellow dome which should be sitting on top of reactor 4 can be clearly seen on the wrong side of the containment building. This type of destruction is is indicative of hard weaponry in use; a hydrogen air mix will not do that. Reactors are not made out of tinfoil. On top of this, there was no potential for an explosion at reactor 4 at all, it had been defueled. SO WHAT, PRAY TELL, BLEW IT APART? That’s the dirty question no one is asking – how did that happen?”
6. From three o’clock onwards the tsunami starts to hit Japan, flooding the reactor: this could not have done the damage claimed or destroyed all of the protection-backup equipment. In all the pictures of the Tsunami, no-one was already fleeing or panicking because of the earthquake, its effect was so terrible because it was unexpected. In Jim Stone’s words, ‘the phony 9.0 story [of earthquake magnitude] was used as seismic cover for a tsunami nuke, which produced the tsunami of a 9.0 when detonated in the Japan trench (where no earthquakes of significance happen) … It is obvious NOTHING happened along the coast of Japan until the tsunami arrived.’.
Reactor 3 was found to be completely missing.
Was that Tsunami artifically caused, by a sea-bed nuke at or near the tectonic plate fissure?
A rescue worker walks past an inferno in Iwaki city, Fukushima prefecture, on Friday following the disaster
This is a WAR AGAINST TERRA: “Compare the containment diagram to the remains of reactor 3. It is painfully obvious that many tons of highly radioactive plutonium in the containment pools is nowhere to be found, the entire floor they were on is completly gone.” Tons of plutonium??
Following the tremor, smoke was seen rising from fires at a number of oil refineries and pipelines like the one pictured here in Tagajo in northern Japan’s Miyagi prefecture.
Early Japanese reports – Ian Crane averred – had nuclear meltdown and reactor core explosion starting befor the Tsunami hit. Now that is quite a claim! This would have been due to, he explained, the Stuxnet virus. (talking with Red Ice Creations, at 36 minutes) That has to imply that they knew when the quake was going to strike – or that it was artificial?
A few days after the catastrophe, Angela Merkel announced that Germany was shutting down its pre-1980 nuclear reactors. An ‘urgent safety review’ was called for. Germany does not exactly have Tsunamis coming down the Rhine, Ian Crane commented, so what was going on? He made a comparison with the immediate aftermath of 911, when Von Bulow ordered all the Lufthansa Boeing planes grounded, and stripped out US computer software from them – the inference being, that German security experts were suspecting robotic control of planes as the modus operandi of 911. The pre-1980 reactors were those having ‘Siemens controllers’ in them.
the Stuxnet virus – the most sophisticated cyberweapon ever deployed – had sucessfully targeted these controllers in the Iranian reactors, the previous year. Stuxnet is an internet worm that will do nothing much until it finds a Siemens programmable logic system. These are found in nuclear power plants.
Support for Ian Crane’s View:
A more recent analysis of the catastrophe, by Yoichi Shimatsu (2nd October) reaches a remarkably similar conclusion: under the heading ‘an Israeli Double-Cross’ :
Tokyo dealt a slap on the wrist to Tel Aviv by backing Palestinian rights at the UN. Not to be bullied, the Israeli secret service launched the Stuxnet virus against Japan’s nuclear facilities.
Firewalls kept Stuxnet at bay until the Tohoku earthquake. The seismic activity felled an electricity tower behind Reactor 6. The power cut disrupted the control system, momentarily taking down the firewall. As the computer came online again, Stuxnet infiltrated to shut down the back-up generators. During the 20-minute interval between quake and tsunami, the pumps and valves at Fukushima No.1 were immobilized, exposing the turbine rooms to flood damage. The flow of coolant water into the storage pools ceased, quickening evaporation. Fission of the overheated cores led to blasts and mushroom-clouds…
The Tohoku earthquake and tsunami were powerful enough to damage Fukushima No.1. The natural disaster, however, was vastly amplified by two external factors: release of the Stuxnet virus, which shut down control systems in the critical 20 minutes prior to the tsunami; and presence of weapons-grade nuclear materials that devastated the nuclear facility and contaminated the entire region.
Likewise the well-known commentator Wayne Madison has the same story of nuclear skullduggery, theft of high-purity weapons-grade material and Israeli triggering of the Fukishama blast:
The super-quake struck Japan, along with the devastating tsunami. At that point in time, Israel and the Americans programmed their Stuxnet computer virus to trigger the nuclear catastrophe at Fukushima, the major site for Japan’s nuclear weapons development program. Stuxnet, developed to disrupt Iran’s nuclear program, is also effective against the nuclear power generation systems of other nations using standard supervisory control and data acquisition (SCADA) software, including the plutonium MOX fuel processing operations at Fukushima. Stuxnet can be used to blackmail recipients of the smuggled plutonium material, including MOX fuel, into silence.
A Japanese journalist, former editor of anational newspaper, is confirming this story: “Israeli intelligence sabotaged the reactor in retaliation for Japan’s support of an independent Palestinian state.” Further,
20 minutes before the Fukushima plant’s nuclear meltdown, Israel was so upset with Japanese support for a Palestinian declaration of statehood that it double-crossed Japan by unleashing the Stuxnet virus on the plant’s computers. The virus hampered the shutdown, leading to fallout from a section of the plant housing uranium and plutonium retrieved from the warheads supplied in 2007
The story keeps alluding to the Fukishama plant having some stored nuclear warheads, somewhat secretly, which impedes the Japanese authorities from speaking out on te subject. ‘Jim Stone’ (Pseudonym) claims to have worked in NASA with ‘above top secret’ clearance specialising in electronic warfare – see here. NB Concerning the sceptical comments posted below: those were from before 2nd October when I’ve now added in this second and it seems to me rather authoritative view, which endorses Ian’s thesis of Israeli complicity – and helps to explain why the Japanese govenment is keeping so quiet about the blast.
* See Appendix 2 of my book, ‘Terror on the Tube’ – Israeli Security Firms: mainly comverse Technology, Verint Systems, ICTS Europe and Fortress GB Ltd.
Note the date numerology 11th of March: 3/11 – same as Madrid bombing in 2004, after 9/11 on 2001.
Was Anders Breivic (AB) a Zionist, who massacred the children in response to Norway’s anti-Israel stance? Or, did he do it for the reason he stated, namely that too many Muslims were flooding into Norway?
The media have taken the latter view, while some eg Adrian Salbucci, have taken the former.
Norway’s Labour party had passed resolutions on this matter just a day or two before. The day before the event, “Norway’s Foreign Minister was met with claims that Norway must recognize a Palestinian state when he visited the Labour Youth League summer camp: The Palestinians must have their own state, the occupation must end, the wall must be demolished and it must happen now, said the Foreign Minister to cheers from the audience.” As Breivik and his fellow operative made their way onto Utøya Island, the teenage Labor Youth activists “were chanting for BDS (Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions) against Israel.” continue reading…
Appeal against unfair dismissal by Tony Farrell: Sheffield Employment Tribunal, 7th-9th September – his case was dismissed. South Yorkshire police argued that ‘conspiracy therory’ was none of their business.
NEW: discussion of the Tony Farrell case on top UK police blog.
Tony Farrell had been employed for twelve years as ‘Principle Intelligence Analyst’ for South Yorkshire Police, 13th largest of the 44 police forces in the UK. His job involved producing a yearly ‘Strategic Threat Assessment Matrix’ to determine how the police force had to prioritise its activities. Assessed ‘threats’ ranged from ASBOs (anti-social behaviour orders) to the terrorist threat allegedly presented by Islamic extremists. Having a statistics degree, it was his job to translate the different ‘strategic threats’ into a ‘matrix’ of relative numerical weighted probabilities.
In 2010, one week before the 5th anniversary of 7/7, Tony (who had never previously doubted government versions of events) stumbled across ‘9/11 Truth’ material on the web. Like so many millions before him, he was shocked to the core by this experience. He quickly realised that there was a great mass of evidence relating to 9/11 kept hidden by the mainstream media. As a Christian, Tony consulted his church minister, who suggested that he consider, whether the same might be true for the London 7/7 bombings? continue reading…
On the morning of July 7th, did the alleged bombers flee from King’s Cross to Canary Wharf – where they were gunned down? Did that really happen? An episode of the intrepid Richard Hall’s Sky TV (June 3rd) “Rich Planet” examined new evidence confirming this, and the likely route they took (See 10-15 minutes into his program). It used testimony of a young man who was on the Thameslink line going South from Luton to Gatwick via King’s Cross that morning, and who experienced a load of anti-terror police activity at Gatwick at 10 o’clock. continue reading…
At 4pm on Thursday 12th May at Southwark Crown Court the jury returned and declared Muad’Dib (Anthony John Hill) innocent of attempting to ‘pervert the course of justice’.
Mr. Hill has spent 151 days incarcerated in Wandsworth prison over the past few months and this verdict spared him, mercifully, a sentence of up to 20 years in jail.
His offence? He had sent six DVD copies of his film ‘7/7: The Ripple Effect’ to various persons at the time (in 2008) of the trial in Kingston of three ‘terror’ suspects, alleged co-conspirators with the London ‘suicide bombers’. The DVD’s were intercepted and never reached their targets. The Kingston suspects were found innocent (only to later be retried for the same offences, but that’s another story). continue reading…
Five years after the event, we have a judgement from Britain’s High Court:
We should here remind ourselves, as to the proper purpose of an inquest.
An inquest is meant to come to a judgement concerning cause of death.
In the very strange circumstances of the 7/7 Inquest, Lady Justice Hallett could not do this because no post-portems had been performed upon the 52 dead bodies. continue reading…
I have lived here all my life. I have never seen Osama bin Laden come and go from this house
Neighbour living in Abottabad where the alleged OBL shooting took place, 9.5.11
This is about the ninth time a major head of state has announced Osama Bin Laden’s death – as President Obama did on 2nd May, 2011.
On May 2nd & 3rd, all UK newspapers and media outlets without exception were proclaiming his death – never mind there was no body anyone could see, never mind the only dead-OBL photo they could produce was speedily exposed as a forgery, never mind no-one at all around the building he was alleged to have been living in could be found, who would say they had seen him there – no tremour of doubt was permitted!
We can see the cut-line along the base of the upper roof support:
This was discovered by the American Simon Shack, in October 2010 – continue reading…
The Inquest heard about three simultaneous underground bomb attacks that were rehearsed in a police terror drill – one week before the three simultaneous underground bomb attacks actually took place, on July 7th, 2005. Was that just a coincidence? Here’s what they said:
The Inquest hears about the Met’s terror drill called, ‘Hanover’ (July 1-2, 2005)
Q. We know from the documents which have been disclosed to us in these proceedings, and indeed which are in the public domain, that on 1 and 2 July 2005, Metropolitan Police officers from your Anti-terrorist Branch conducted a table-top training exercise which had at its core an attack on the London Underground. continue reading…
