In the Comments, Arthur McBride added https://www.unz.com/article/terror-on-the-tube-behind-the-veil-of-7-7-review-of-the-book-by-nick-kollerstrom/#comment-4761174
“”For any who may not know, Nicholas Kollerstrom PhD (History of Science, Astronomy) has also written “Breaking the Spell / The Holocaust; Myth & Reality.”
Now in its 5th edition (2019), Dr Kollerstrom was fired from an honorary teaching post at University College London for publishing this book.
It’s an interesting evidentiary work, using Enigma transcripts —
In 1941, British Intelligence analysts cracked the German “Enigma” code. This undermined the German war effort – but also threw new light on day-by-day events in the Nazi concentration camp system. Between January 1942 and January 1943, encrypted radio communications between those camps and the Berlin headquarters were intercepted and decrypted.”
The author Anthony black then added https://www.unz.com/article/terror-on-the-tube-behind-the-veil-of-7-7-review-of-the-book-by-nick-kollerstrom/#comment-4763784
” Thanks for mentioning ‘Breaking the Spell’….a superb volume, and one that I have long thought of doing an ‘overview’ of. Of course, there are many who will simply and mindlessly dismiss Kollerstrom as a ‘Holocaust denier’ when, in fact, his work is a sober, scientific analysis of the latest findings from the last three decades of newly released material, i.e. the British Intel decrpyts, the chemical analyses of samples taken from the walls of the ‘gas chambers’ at Auschwitz, the Bad Arolsen Archive releases, etc. However, in attempting such a project I am only too aware of the likely consequences, i.e. instant and profound condemnation. Indeed, I suspect that just by virtue of having done an essay on a book by Kollerstrom, i.e. ‘Terror on the Tube’, and having nothing to do with the ‘Holocaust’, I have already been blacklisted from many ‘progressive’ sites, e.g. Off-Guardian – with whom I had just prior published two other essays – not only refused to publish this present essay, but cut off all communication with me following my submission. Global Research – again, with whom I had previously published with great success – has refused to accept any further essays from me. This, then, is a subject that is riven with serious risk for any writer or researcher. Still, now that I am retired from my day job…and now that Ron Unz has been good enough to publish some of my more recent essays….I may soon get down to the job of doing the review on ‘Breaking the Spell’. A. Black “
then ‘Truth Vigilante’ added a comment about my book ‘Chronicles of False Flag Terror’ https://www.unz.com/article/terror-on-the-tube-behind-the-veil-of-7-7-review-of-the-book-by-nick-kollerstrom/#comment-4764635 as ‘yet another great read.’
Surgeons have a financial motivation to declare you are dead before you have died – may rip your heart out before you are dead! People remain conscious for a couple of minutes after cardiac arrest. Huge profits made by selling organs WITHOUT the permission of the victim /’donor’.
Blood farming and the black market of organ trade – a global trade, organs harvested when you are not really dead! ‘The rise of intense demonic evil infesting the medical profession’ – Health Ranger (speaking on Infowars).
Ditto for ‘partial birth abortions’ – murder the baby and harvest the organs. Chop the baby up, sell it off! That’s why vaccines contain aborted human fetal tissue.
Oxygen-starved organs are not so useful for the organ-transplant industry.
To stop this you have to sign while you are alive, saying NO they can’t do this.
From 2020, adults in England will be considered POTENTIAL DONORS of their organs (eyes, kidney’s etc etc) unless they choose to OPT OUT or are … excluded (for whatever reason) NOTE: * Organs from cadavers CANNOT be used (it errr? means you’re F*ck-all use, if you’re dead! – They have to keep you errrr? ‘alive’ (on a ventilator!) to harvest your organs. This is known as ‘BRAIN DEAD’https://www.gov.uk/…/opt-out-organ-donation-max-and… IF you’re intending to ‘Opt-IN’ … remember what’s ahead, if there’s a 40:60 chance of surviving … (‘md’ comment)
Here s how you can say NO LEAVE MY ORGANS ALONE https://www.organdonation.nhs.uk/register-your-decision/do-not-donate/
Mother shares her experience of giving birth in a hospital –
Moral – keep clear of hospitals! ‘Here be Vampyres’
She was admittedly talking about the Tribe, always a risky business.
‘He did not wish to go about in Judea because the Jews were looking for an opportunity to kill him.’ – 4th Gospel 7:1. ‘They are not pleasing to God and have made themselves the enemies of all mankind’ – Thessalonians 2:15
Turning to the Act of 2003, it is surely clear that it was designed to regulate public media, not individual blogs. However, the Court took the position, that section 127 of the Communications Act 2003 can apply to ANYTHING on the internet which SOMEBODY deems to be ‘grossly offensive’
The obvious implication is that it is only the Chosen Ones who have the authority to deem some internet statement to be ‘grossly offensive.’
The Verdict sounds kind of rational on one level but is actually pure madness. The claim that someone has been ‘grossly offensive’ on the internet – if that be a crime, then any boundary between innocence and guilt has been utterly dissolved.
Also, pretending that a person being interviewed on a website amounts to sending a message in the sense of the 2003 Communications Act is just so dishonest. Law courts are supposed to look after the meanings of words, not twist them like this.
The Court has claimed that merely posting a link to some satirical song of hers ‘may be defamatory.’
Now in the last century the word ‘crime’ had a meaning and we all knew what it was viz unacceptable harm or loss. It was something which had a victim. And ‘defamation’ was likewise clearly defined, as adversely affecting someone’s professional reputation.
This judgement has killed stone dead the tradition of British comedy. Mind you in these ‘woke’ times it has pretty well been killed anyhow. Satire? Get ready for a prison sentence if it annoys the wrong people.
The charges relate to offensive comments she made about the Holocaust on The Graham Hart Show and Realist Radio in 2019, while she was serving a suspended sentence.
She did not cause anything to be ‘sent’ by being on a US interview and so the 2003 Communications Act is not applicable. ‘the ‘grossly offensive’ charge as a crime comes from Section 127 of the 2003 Communications Act:
“Offences that fall under section 127 of the Communications Act 2003 include the following: A person sending any public electronic communications network a message or other content that is grossly offensive or of an indecent, obscene or menacing character. A person causes any such message or content to be sent….
It is clear from section 127 –
“(1) A person is guilty of an offence if he— (a) sends by means of a public electronic communications network a message or other matter that is grossly offensive or of an indecent, obscene or menacing character; or (b) causes any such message or MATTER to be so sent.
(2)A person is guilty of an offence if, for the purpose of causing annoyance, inconvenience or needless anxiety to another, he (a) sends by means of a public electronic communications network, a message that he knows to be false, (b) causes such a message to be sent; or (c) persistently makes use of a public electronic communications network.”
By misusing the law in this devious manner the judge has caused great harm to the concept of Justice and destroyed respect for the law. Who is innocent? Has any jury ever agreed that a satirical songwriter be jailed for three months because someone claims to have been offended?
How is it possible that the person bringing the prosecution is the same person who makes the judgement about ‘grossly offensive’ comments?
The media are there to generate hate against her when she cannot reply. the Mail alleges in its headline that Alison had said ‘Hitler was right.’ when did she ever say that and to whom?
The Daily Mail has quickly cut off comments on their article, headed “Anti-Semitic blogger, 56, who believes ‘Hitler was right’ is jailed for 18 weeks for saying Jewish people use Holocaust as ‘eternal cash cow'”.
What Judge Michael Snow said about Alison Chabloz is ‘grossly offensive’, too, and even more so. The same applies to what he said about Julian Assange (https://wikispooks.com/wiki/Michael_Snow) calling him a ‘narcissist’ and telling him to ‘get over to US’ – and ‘pacissifical protesters’, and probably Brian Haw, too (http://brianhaw.tv/index.php/blog/3173-the-bbc-to-try-to-portray-district-judge-michael-snow-job-as-a-snowflake-23-04-2015).
“Anything goes in a court of law, except telling the truth if it is ‘grossly offensive’. The oath should be amended to: “I promise to tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth, unless the truth is grossly offensive”. – Ian Fantom
She’s in Bronzefield women’s prison in Ashford, run by Sodexo Justice Services. According to Wikipedia : “In August 2013, Sodexo Justice Services was criticised in an official report for subjecting a female prisoner to “cruel, inhumane and degrading treatment”, which “appears to amount to torture” at HMP Bronzefield in Ashford, Surrey, UK. The woman was kept segregated from other prisoners in an “unkempt and squalid” prison cell for more than five year
No friends are allowed to visit Ms Chabloz, only close relatives. She will be very much alone I guess.
She’s been banned from posting up her own stuff but we can enjoy this satirical-humour piece of hers, which someone posted up for her, over-writing Elaine Paige:
The harrassment of AC does not stop. For my comments upon an earlier prosecution of her see here.
PROOF – in elderly care home in Germany, 31 healthy persons vaccinated, 8 die within 4 weeks.
Figure: weekly death totals over the four months October to January in red, compared to expected values in green. Note the dip over two weeks of the festive season – or what used to be the festive season: folks refrain from dying then.
November 2020 49,057 / 41,418 deaths => 18% increase
January 2021 72,917 / 51,158 deaths => 42% increase.
Managers and staff at a Bristol care home have described how they did everything they could to keep coronavirus out – only for it to arrive just two weeks ago. Their valiant efforts kept the virus at bay for 11 months, until a sudden outbreak in the home in the third week of January – after all the residents had been vaccinated.
no cases of flu recorded this winter – Independent https://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?p=228077
They are trying to resuscitate another big scare, trying to claim there is a second wave … come this autumn, they have started drumming up fear again, they have imposed these levels of Lockdown which are rather terrifying. A lot of stress they are putting on people, I’ve been wondering, are the deaths going to go up again like last time?
According to new data, the U.S. currently ranks first in total COVID-19 cases, new cases per day and deaths. Genevieve Briand, assistant program director of the Applied Economics master’s degree program at Hopkins, critically analyzed the effect of COVID-19 on U.S. deaths using data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) in her webinar titled “COVID-19 Deaths: A Look at U.S. Data.”
From mid-March to mid-September, U.S. total deaths have reached 1.7 million, of which 200,000, or 12% of total deaths, are COVID-19-related. Instead of looking directly at COVID-19 deaths, Briand focused on total deaths per age group and per cause of death in the U.S. and used this information to shed light on the effects of COVID-19.
She explained that the significance of COVID-19 on U.S. deaths can be fully understood only through comparison to the number of total deaths in the United States.
After retrieving data on the CDC website, Briand compiled a graph representing percentages of total deaths per age category from early February to early September, which includes the period from before COVID-19 was detected in the U.S. to after infection rates soared.
Surprisingly, the deaths of older people stayed the same before and after COVID-19. Since COVID-19 mainly affects the elderly, experts expected an increase in the percentage of deaths in older age groups. However, this increase is not seen from the CDC data. In fact, the percentages of deaths among all age groups remain relatively the same.
“The reason we have a higher number of reported COVID-19 deaths among older individuals than younger individuals is simply because every day in the U.S. older individuals die in higher numbers than younger individuals,” Briand said.
Briand also noted that 50,000 to 70,000 deaths are seen both before and after COVID-19, indicating that this number of deaths was normal long before COVID-19 emerged. Therefore, according to Briand, not only has COVID-19 had no effect on the percentage of deaths of older people, but it has also not increased the total number of deaths.
These data analyses suggest that in contrast to most people’s assumptions, the number of deaths by COVID-19 is not alarming. In fact, it has relatively no effect on deaths in the United States…
When Briand looked at the 2020 data during that seasonal period, COVID-19-related deaths exceeded deaths from heart diseases. This was highly unusual since heart disease has always prevailed as the leading cause of deaths. However, when taking a closer look at the death numbers, she noted something strange. As Briand compared the number of deaths per cause during that period in 2020 to 2018, she noticed that instead of the expected drastic increase across all causes, there was a significant decrease in deaths due to heart disease. Even more surprising, as seen in the graph below, this sudden decline in deaths is observed for all other causes.
This trend is completely contrary to the pattern observed in all previous years. Interestingly, as depicted in the table below, the total decrease in deaths by other causes almost exactly equals the increase in deaths by COVID-19. This suggests, according to Briand, that the COVID-19 death toll is misleading. Briand believes that deaths due to heart diseases, respiratory diseases, influenza and pneumonia may instead be recategorized as being due to COVID-19.
Where test results do not correspond with the clinical presentation, a new specimen should be taken and retested using the same or different NAT technology.
Most PCR assays are indicated as an aid for diagnosis, therefore, health care providers must consider any result in combination with timing of sampling, specimen type, assay specifics, clinical observations, patient history, confirmed status of any contacts, and epidemiological information.
“It’s all exaggerated. It’s an acute respiratory disease with minimal mortality.”
“No virus isolates with a quantified amount of the SARS-CoV-2 are currently available …”
“Since no quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV are currently available, assays [diagnostic tests] designed for detection of the 2019-nCoV RNA were tested with characterized stocks of in vitro transcribed full length RNA…”
‘He said that older people had the right to make efforts to stay fit, active, busy and healthy. But he warned that the shutdown of society would condemn them to early death by preventing this.
‘Social contacts and social events, theatre and music, travel and holiday recreation, sports and hobbies, all help to prolong their stay on earth. The life expectancy of millions is being shortened.’
In a prediction that has turned out to be terribly accurate, he added: ‘The horrifying impact on the world economy threatens the existence of countless people. The consequences for medical care are profound. Already services to patients who are in need are reduced, operations cancelled, practices empty, hospital personnel dwindling. All this will impact profoundly on our whole society.’
a. 510,000 people would perish due to Sars-Cov2 in the UK alone, if the draconian measures imposed had not been introduced.
b. Sars-Cov2 is an airborne High Consequence Infectious Disease [HCID], worthy of being declared a worldwide pandemic, as well as a Public Health Emergency.
c. Sars-Cov2 has been isolated and purified, and therefore, proven to exist.
d. Masks are a safe and effective method of preventing the spread of Sars-Cov2.
e. The policies introduced were entirely founded on the latest scientific data available.
f. PCR tests detect the presence of Sars-Cov2 in the human body.”
‘COVID-19 nRNA Vaccine BNT 162b2 is highly purified single-stranded , 5-capped messenger RNA (mRNA) produced by cell-free in vitro transcription from the corresponding DNA templates, encoding the viral spike (S) protein of SARS-COV-2′