How the Sandy Hook Massacre went down

January 13, 2013 NK 7 comments

by Andrew McGregor

The notorious car photographed leaving the scene of the Sandy Hook school shooting does NOT belong to Adam Lanza or his mother. The audio from the police radio contains the vehicle registration request and reply. The car is registered to Christopher A. Rodia, on charge for larceny and narcotics. Christopher A. Rodia: Rodia, 42, is from Norwalk CT. He has quite a list of previous drug and burglary charges, seems to be big on stealing leaf blowers and is currently awaiting trial for at least his 5th count of stealing a leaf blower. He had an active arrest warrant on October 8th. One of the more recent times he has been in the news was for stealing copper wire from a construction site with his 19-year-old niece, Cassandra Scire, 19. His court hearing was 21 December 2012 for Larceny, Forgery and Narc possession. Rodia and Scire live in the same home at 19 Vollmer Ave., Norwalk, CT. Cassandra is affiliated with one George Uzar arrested with an arsenal of weapons.

This little article tells us quite a lot if this article is correct. The trouble is, the information is not factual. The initial report would be factual, but the information would lead to dead ends. This vehicle would be an FBI ‘Operational vehicle’ and thus have fictitious registration details.

What we have at the beginning of the massacre are two vehicles arriving at the Elementary School, one belonging to Nancy Lanza, and the second vehicle supposedly registered to Christopher Rodia, a non-existent person.

Now I doubt if Adam Lanza was in a condition to actually drive to his own murder. I would suggest that somebody else drove his car to Sandy Hook. I would also suggest that this person was FBI and from the ‘Counter-Terrorist section. I would suggest that there were also other FBI agents travelling in “Rodia’s” vehicle.

Rodia’s vehicle would contain a driver, the two unnamed men arrested at the Sandy Hook Elementary school and one other person.

What must also be made quite clear is that the Massacre at Sandy Hook follows the same modus operandi as the Dunblane Massacre in Scotland in March 1996.

Now this is important in the plan of things. I believe that the Sandy Hook Elementary School had a CCTV security system. It would have been located in the Administration Office of the School. For the massacre to have gone down as required, this CCTV system had to first be destroyed, much the same as the turning off the CCTV camera in the tunnel where Princess Diana was murdered, and in the London subway and bus, for the 7/7 ‘terrorist event’, and again of course for the assassination of Jean Charles de Menezes.

This is why the ‘gunman’ went first to the Administration room and had the ‘argument with staff’, and caused one brave person to switch on the loudspeaker system alerting the rest of the staff. The shooting in the administration block was the start of the massacre, and besides the staff therein, the CCTV system would have also been shot up making it incapable of recording all further actions within the massacre.

Now it was possible for the rest of the massacre to unfold. The second FBI agent gets out of Lanza’s car and hands Lanza over to the two apprehended FBI gunmen. These two men also pick up a large quantity of required firearms from the vehicle that were discovered by police later on. The second FBI agent then moves to cover his ‘partner’.

So, did these firearms selected to be left at the scene of the massacre actually belong to the victim, Nancy Lanza? It would have been extremely unlikely, but what would be more likely would be that these firearms would have been placed on Connecticut’s firearm registry in Nancy Lanza’s name by someone from the FBI Counter-Terrorist section.

Now the FBI agent ‘covering’ his partner would have had a scanning device to pick-up the local police radio calls. After shooting up the classroom these FBI agents would have been warned of the first approaching police vehicles. They immediately return to the Rodia vehicle and the FBI gunman, not wishing to have the ‘Bushmaster’ .223 rifle in his possession in case of capture and arrest by the police, returns it to the trunk of Nancy Lanza’s Honda. The driver then drives off as the first police units arrive.

Police again using normal video equipment (something we didn’t have in my day) arrived in time to see this vehicle leaving the scene and request registration information.

Again, the first police to arrive at the Sandy Hook Elementary hear ‘shots fired’ and report as such. This would make the matter urgent and ‘lights and sirens’ may have been activated.

But back to the two FBI gunmen with Adam Lanza. They are not in a position to be aware of what is happening around them. They ‘execute’ Adam Lanza as required, and they may have discharged other shots from other weapons, I cannot tell from the information at hand, but again they have not been alerted of the approaching local police until it is far too late.

They attempt to flee, but a teacher informs police of ‘two shadows’ moving past the gym, and the first is apprehended. After a foot chase into the local woods the second is apprehended.

Now why did one of the arrested offenders yell at parents that they hadn’t murdered the children? Simply because the truth of the matter is that they didn’t, and the proof of that is that the ‘local’ police found the actual murder weapon in the trunk of Nancy Lanza’s Honda sedan. This simply proves that there was another team that shot the schoolchildren and their teachers.

How do we know that the FBI agents were in Rodia’s vehicle? That is easy to answer. Neither of the two men arrested by police at the Sandy Hook Elementary School were carrying identification. Nobody knows who they were, and once returned to the local police station, the FBI would have turned up and required these men to be handed over to them.

How do we know that the Sandy Hook Massacre was an FBI operation? There is a choice of two possibilities. Either Sandy Hook was another ‘Lone-nut’ gun massacre committed by Adam Lanza or it was an FBI operation. Once you comprehend that Adam Lanza was shot after police arrived at the Sandy Hook Elementary school, and yet the main murder weapon, the ‘.223 Bushmaster’, the No. 6 on the gun ban list, was initially found in the trunk of Nancy Lanza’s Honda sedan, then it is impossible for Adam Lanza to have been the gunman.

All leads to the identity of these two FBI agents would vanish, and in time people would be conditioned to simply remember the ‘Lone-nut’ gunman who was ‘suicided’ at the scene of the Sandy Hook Massacre.

(If you liked this, read Andrew’s earlier article on 7/7, The Fate of Khan)

Also: Sandy Hook as state Terror, Analogies with London bombings

Andrew S. MacGregor

Senior Constable 15891 (retired)

Victoria Police Force from 1968/85

#1 | Written by forthurst about 11 years ago. Reply

“There is a choice of two possibilities. Either Sandy Hook was another ‘Lone-nut’ gun massacre committed by Adam Lanza or it was an FBI operation.”

Total rubbish. Why not keep an open mind? For example: what about the DHS? They have ordered millions of rounds of ammunition, some hollow point, some sniper. Bearing in mind the DHS came directly out of the 9/11 false flag, it has been illegitimate from the off. What sort of people would murder children in cold blood? The same sort of people who could and did murder 3000 on 9/11. Has anybody suggested this was the FBI? Who have the DHS recruited whose modus operandi would include sniping at and blasting with hollow point ammunition thousands or even millions of Americans?

http://chemtrailsplanet.net/2012/12/21/dhs-purchases-200-million-more-rounds-of-ammunition/

Nor have we seen as yet convincing evidence that children were murdered. So far we have seen some very iffy interviews with ‘grieving relatives’. We have been told that they were shot (at close range) by a .233 calibre rifle, a weapon using a high velocity bullet accurate at considerable distance. Such a weapon would do so much damage a close quarters it would be very difficult to actually count discrete wounds; furthermore, none would actually lodge in a victim sp how does a pathologist announce each child was shot 3-11 times? I’m also not clear how Adam Lanza, dressed in his finest assassin’s uniform was driven to the school with an FBI agent; who was driving? Adam Lanza?
#2 | Written by forthurst about 11 years ago. Reply

Apparently, Cathy Gaubert was somewhat mortified to find a photo that she had taken of her own daughter, Lilly on a Sandy Hook Facebook memorial page with the pseudonym, ‘Alison Wyatt’. Whose been hoovering Flickr for pictures of pretty white children of kindergarten age??

http://www.cluesforum.info/viewtopic.php?f=24&t=1521&hilit=sandy+hook&start=735#p2380180
#3 | Written by Andrew S. MacGregor about 11 years ago. Reply

I must disagree with ‘forthhurst’ for one extremely important argument. At the Aurora Theatre massacre, when Police Chief Dan Oates was addressing a media question time, directly behind Oates was FBI Agent James F Yacone, formerly of the FBI ‘Counter-Terrorist’ group.

The Newtown Bee has now comfirmed that one of the two arrested suspects at the Sandy Hook Massacre was an ‘Off-duty’ ERT police member from a different town. In other words, the Putnam ERT task force, at the school just down the road, was waiting to be ordered to attend Sandy Hook, rather than the local police. Now this was the ‘suspect’ who was described as having four handguns and wearing a bulletproof vest.

The first valid question is what was an ‘off-duty’ policeman doing carrying arms in a ‘gun-free zone’? The second question iswhy would a fully trained ERT member run away from an area where a ‘lone-nut’ gunman was killing children? You would expect him to charge into the fray, unless of course he was part of the team that murdered Lanza, and was still carrying the murder weapon.

It is though the FBI, or so I am told that controls the various police farces with the USA. I do agree totally that the DHS, which includes FEMA which was incorporated within the DHS in March 2003 to help ‘fight terrorism’ and the Marxist BATF&E, have now all joined together to push the UN agenda against firearms.

As for the ‘grieving parents’, I would believe that from previous experience, the gov’t does not trust the ‘victims’ or relatives to follow the ‘prescribed’ agenda, and that is why the ‘actors’ have been brought in to fill that role.

There is also the furphy that most of the children murdered were Jewish, but the funeral services for the first four victims that were buried took place in ‘Christian’ churches.

Just as the Oklahoma bombing was used to vilify the American Militia movements, what you are seeing at the moment with the Sandy Hook Massacre is a huge operation to vilify those people who dare question the Government line, that is the so-called ‘Conspiracy Theorists’.
#4 | Written by Andrew S. MacGregor about 11 years ago. Reply

Dear Nick,

One of the pieces of information that keeps coming across was that the gunman fired off between 100 and 200 rounds of ammunition. The reality of what we have seen with Dr Carvers reports is that the children had multiple wounds, which suggests that the gunman actually sprayed his targets. This in mind then leads to consideration as to the number of magazines for the rifle and the quantity of ammunition each magazine would hold. I believe I read somewhere that the gunman had taped the mags together for quick reloads, but the one thing I cannot find is the number of magazines, and just how much unused rounds that were retained in these mags.

Interesting.
#5 | Written by Emmanuel about 10 years ago. Reply

Hmm it seems like your website ate my first comment (it was super long) so
I guess I’ll just sum it up what I wrote and say, I’m thoroughly enjoying your blog.
I too am an aspiring blog blogger but I’m still new to everything. Do you have any tips for inexperienced blog writers? I’d really appreciate it.
#6 | Written by Andrew S. MacGregor about 8 years ago. Reply

Dear Nick,

I have erred, and I should have told you years ago, and I apologise for that.

I associated the Sandy Hook Massacre with the Dunblane Massacre. However, what I didn’t take into account is how can there be murders without a murder weapon? There was no bushmaster AR-15 at Sandy Hook.

The first reports had suggested that the shooter had used a pistol or pistols to commit the murders, but for heavens sake, whenever somebody fires a semi-automatic weapon normally the fired cartridges are expelled from the weapon. Thus had there been a ‘massacre’ then the expended cartridges would have immediately informed any witness what type of weapon was used. That means that it would be impossible for the murder weapon in a real event to be initially mistaken as handguns, had there been .223 fired cartridge cases lying all over the place, not only within the school building but also near the dead teachers vehicle and also at the glass security door.

And then there was the filmed chase and arrest of a ‘suspect’ who turned out to be an ‘off-duty’ policeman, very much after the supposed ‘massacre’.

Sandy Hook was always a ‘police exercise’ designed to support the ‘New gun Laws’ required by Hillary Clinton and the American State Department with their UN Treaty being pursued at that particular time.

Andrew S. MacGregor
#7 | Written by Wendy Cox about 8 years ago. Reply

Mr. MacGregor, we have a mutual friend M. Gaddy whom lead me to your articles on false flag event in order to promote gun control. I was wondering if you had any thoughts on the Oregon FBI shootout with LaVoy Finicum? Not sure if you have followed this story at all. But sure is a good one.

TERROR ON THE TUBE

Recent Posts

Browse by Tags

How the Sandy Hook Massacre went down

by Andrew McGregor

This little article tells us quite a lot if this article is correct. The trouble is, the information is not factual. The initial report would be factual, but the information would lead to dead ends. This vehicle would be an FBI ‘Operational vehicle’ and thus have fictitious registration details.

What we have at the beginning of the massacre are two vehicles arriving at the Elementary School, one belonging to Nancy Lanza, and the second vehicle supposedly registered to Christopher Rodia, a non-existent person.

Rodia’s vehicle would contain a driver, the two unnamed men arrested at the Sandy Hook Elementary school and one other person.

What must also be made quite clear is that the Massacre at Sandy Hook follows the same modus operandi as the Dunblane Massacre in Scotland in March 1996.

Police again using normal video equipment (something we didn’t have in my day) arrived in time to see this vehicle leaving the scene and request registration information.

Again, the first police to arrive at the Sandy Hook Elementary hear ‘shots fired’ and report as such. This would make the matter urgent and ‘lights and sirens’ may have been activated.

They attempt to flee, but a teacher informs police of ‘two shadows’ moving past the gym, and the first is apprehended. After a foot chase into the local woods the second is apprehended.

All leads to the identity of these two FBI agents would vanish, and in time people would be conditioned to simply remember the ‘Lone-nut’ gunman who was ‘suicided’ at the scene of the Sandy Hook Massacre.

(If you liked this, read Andrew’s earlier article on 7/7, The Fate of Khan)

Also: Sandy Hook as state Terror, Analogies with London bombings

Andrew S. MacGregor

Senior Constable 15891 (retired)

Victoria Police Force from 1968/85

Leave a Comment