Official government stats show a staggering DROP in mortality as the CV-19 allegedly ‘hit’ Britain in mid-January.

Five thousand LESS people died from then onwards – January to March of this year – as compared with the previous five years.

the data comes from https://www.ons.gov.uk and the page is called 

ALL DEATHS IN ENGLAND AND WALES (All cause mortality) by week, comparing 2020 with the previous 5 years

Here is a bar-chart of these total deaths, November 2019 to March 2020. So for each week, the Office of National Statistics has very helpfully taken the same seven days over the previous 5 years, and averaged them together – so one can see if this year’s is better or worse. 

The red bars are smaller, ie LESS people are dying, since CV arrived. (We also see the tragic peak at the start of January each year – the most depressing time of year. But hey, the Xmas period seems to stop folks from dying, I guess it cheers them up!)  

Here is the same data plotted as % difference of the last five months, compared to earlier years:

 

A staggering ten percent swing! What mysterious FORCE is stopping Brits from dying, since CV arrived in January?  A trend-line is put thru the data (a 3-point moving average)

A Problem of definition

I’m  a science guy and generally try to use coherent logic, greatly lacking in the present crisis.  What questions should we be asking? 

If a person dies having tested positive with CV-19, then I have not seen evidence for a causal connection, i.e. that the virus caused the death. But one can imagine what that evidence would look like.

For the US, one person in six now tests positive for CV19, of which about 2% require hospital treatment (source: 600,000 people tested in the US) That degree of correlation of CV-19 with ‘needing hospital treatment’ does not seem different from ordinary flu.

(I do not personally understand what is meant by ‘tests positive’: a procedure for getting DNA strands to replicate as invented by Kary Mullis is used, and that is repeated some number of times, then somehow a ‘Yes’ or ‘No’ verdict is obtained…  this is science on the very edge of intelligibility, if  not beyond it)

According to UK government figures over the last five years or so, about twenty thousand people a year die from flu. We’re now at about ten percent of that figure, for deaths where persons have tested positive for CV-19.

CV is a normal part of the flu viruses that sweep around the world every year. Something like 10% of all flu viruses are CV. Our Question is, are these other CVs more or less harmful that CV-19?

Professor Sucharit Bhakdi asks: ‘To gauge the true danger of the virus, what is the type of information we need?’ and his answer is: we compare the effect of CV-19 with the common corona viruses ‘that we live with every day.’     (see 4-5 minutes of video).

He described a comparison of ten thousand patients ‘all with respiratory track diseases that are infected with common corona viruses; and then another ten thousand such cases infected with CV-19′. Is the mortality any different, between the two groups? No, it was the same – no significant difference (a French study published 19th March, he does not give details.)

That is how the control group should be set up, for testing the theory, that CV-19 is killing more people than ordinary flu.

Instead of such rational enquiry, “ the vast majority of respiratory deaths in the UK are recorded as bronchopneumonia, pneumonia, old age or a similar designation. We don’t really test for flu, or other seasonal infections.” (Here) And many of these are now getting diagnosed as CV-19. So the ‘terrifying epidemic’ that is ‘growing exponentially’ may be mainly coming from improper medical logic.

For some different figures to compare, Dr John Lee in the Spectator 28th March gave these   Of the people dying in the first three months of this year, globally, the CV cases represent 0.14%; and he concludes: “These figures might shoot up but they are, right now, lower than other infectious diseases that we live with (such as flu)”

The media report ‘deaths from coronavirus’ as if it were the cause, whereas the individual reports don’t say that, they say death of a person who tested positive for CV. We could be locking down the whole country due to bad logic.

Notice how you don’t know anyone who is ill due to CV, and probably you don’t know anyone who knows anyone who has got ‘it’: it’s just something you see reported on TV.

Acknowledgement: thanks to Sarah Hollins for discovering this effect, and telling me.

If you just read one person discussing the issue, hear this fellow, a nano-pathologist.

“The real question is, is this serious enough to warrant putting most of our population into house imprisonment, wrecking our economy for an indefinite period, destroying businesses that honest and hardworking people have taken years to build up, saddling future generations with debt, depression, stress, heart attacks, suicides and unbelievable distress inflicted on millions of people who are not especially vulnerable, and will suffer only mild symptoms or none at all?”

Here is a brilliant medic expert:   ‘So the implications are quite clear: If you want to create a totally false panic,  about a totally false pandemic, pick a coronavirus.’  Marvellously lucid!  

‘Before long you have your pandemic, totally fabricated. All you’ve done is use a single test-kit trick to convert the worst flu and pneumonia cases into something new that doesn’t actually exist.   Now just run the same scam in other counrties. Make sure to keep the fear running high so people will feel panicky and less able to think critically 

Shall i tell you what this whole cataclysm really needs to be resolved? It needs philosophers of science, who can discuss the nature of causality. Yep. This whole scam is based on illegitimate, utterly bogus notions of correlation without causality…. 

 

Share