TERROR ON THE TUBE

Vaccinated persons are more likely to get ‘Covid-19’ than unvaxxed people – much more likely! This staggering new conclusion comes from official UK government figures.

Data released by the ‘UK Health Security Agency’ (see Here) gives a breakdown of covid cases for vaccinated versus unvaccinated persons stratified by age groups: just what we’ve been looking for. The data is for England not the UK, and it covers a four-week period for last September.

Let’s count all of the over-fifty cases. I’m not keen on looking at younger age groups because the disease was always said to be one which afflicts primarily older people (see graph, from last year’s data).

The new data shows that vaccinated persons are 70% more likely to get ‘Covid-19‘ than unvaccinated persons. Let’s take a look at the figures.

The ‘Covid-19 Vaccine Surveillance Report‘ issued by the UK Health and Security Agency has on its page 13 a count of all Covid-19 cases in the four-week period. It separates them into vaxxed and unvaxxed. Its 4th column gives unvaxxed totals while the next three columns count up all the vaxxed. We add up four rows of these columns, from age 50-59 up to ages 80+, and that gives altogether: 8,083 unvaxxed who had ‘Covid-19,’ compared to 122,880 vaxxed who had it. That is twenty-one times more vaxxed than unvaxxed.

We could just leave it there.

Of the over-fifties in England – 21.3 million of them, this year – 90% have taken the jab. I’m rather amazed at this figure! I had though there were more rebels and sceptics around. But no – there seem to be only ten percent of us left.

Doing the maths, I divided the number of cases by the number of people in England over fifty for the two groups, and it comes out that the unvaxxed had 3.7k cases per million while the vaxxed had 6.4k cases per million. The ratio of those two figures gives us the amazing 70% excess of people who have ‘got Covid-19’ amongst vaxxed persons, compared to unvaxxed.

One thing’s for sure – somebody’s got some explaining to do.

Let us hope that the government continues to put out this monthly data with the all-important division between vaxxed and unvaxxed. That division is the most important thing in the world right now, and it will continue to be so through this coming winter.

The Daily Sceptic was not happy about this government data, which it summarised as: ‘infection rates for vaccinated aged 40-79 hit double the rates for the unvaccinated,’ explaining that: “Infection rates are now higher in the double-vaccinated compared to the unvaccinated by 124% in those in their 40s, 103% in those in their 50s and 60s and 101% in those in their 70s.” This could show ‘the large and fast decline in effectiveness against infection.’

Another thing: these weekly data-sets consistently show that FIFTY TIMES more ‘Covid cases’ are DOUBLE_VAXXED compared to cases for single-vaxxed. Should not someone be commenting upon this?

The above data is also discussed here: “Vaccinated Adults Far More Likely To Get Infected. ”

Boris chimed in helpfully saying that the vaccine ” doesn’t protect you against infection and doesn’t protect you against passing it on.” Right. So Boris just nullified any argument for vaccine passports.

Note on data: to find the number of people in England vaxxed by age group see here.

These guys have copied my analysis: https://www.globalresearch.ca/fully-vaccinated-suffering-far-higher-rates-infection-than-unvaccinated-getting-worse/5759817 They remark:
“All of the UK’s 30-and-over vaccinated now endure far higher rates of infection than their unvaccinated counterparts. …
The entire 40-79 vaccinated cohort is deeply negative, now below minus 50%, meaning they suffer more than double the infection rate of their unvaccinated counterparts …
Why should the vaccinated suffer mounting infection rates, while case-rates of the unvaccinated both declined and are lower?
there can be little doubt the vaccinated now constitute by far the greatest Covid transmission risk. ”

Here are total weekly deaths for England and Wales as given by the Office of National Statistics. Since mid-July this figure has mysteriously soared above the normal count with the start of August showing a thousand excess deaths per week (that’s the blue line – a trend value with each point as the average of three weeks). Average weekly-deaths for this time of year is around 9,500. The ONS helpfully gives an average value over a previous five years, 2015-9 (here shown in green) and we see how this reaches a minimum in the pleasant month of August.

We see how in the early part of the year deaths were way below the seasonal trend. That’s because the previous year saw massive extra deaths of old and infirm people, caused by the government lockdowns which terrorised them and stressed them out, also despair killed a lot of people with bankruptcies etc. There was a second lockdown period November 2020 to January 2021 which caused another huge peak in mortality. For that reason, there were a lot less deaths in the spring of 2021, as this graph shows.

As is reported in today’s newspapers (25 August) of the weekly total ending August 13: ‘That is 14% above the five-year average, or 1,270 ‘excess deaths.’ We’re being told that the excess is due to some ‘Delta variant’ of Covid, but I suggest this is not the case.

What we are seeing here is surely the effect of the the mass vaccination program. Is it indeed a bioweapon? Let us keep a close eye on this trendline over the coming Autumn and Winter.

Clearly, we’d all like to have these death figures separated by Vaxxed / Un-Vaxxed – and clearly, nobody is about to give us that! This looks like being the slow-motion knockout effect from the mRNA spike-protein cocktail, that people have been so keen to take.

The Unz Review carried a brilliant review of my 2012 book ‘terror on the Tube’ about the London Bombings of 2005, by Anthony C. Black.

In the Comments, Arthur McBride added https://www.unz.com/article/terror-on-the-tube-behind-the-veil-of-7-7-review-of-the-book-by-nick-kollerstrom/#comment-4761174

“”For any who may not know, Nicholas Kollerstrom PhD (History of Science, Astronomy) has also written “Breaking the Spell / The Holocaust; Myth & Reality.”

Now in its 5th edition (2019), Dr Kollerstrom was fired from an honorary teaching post at University College London for publishing this book.
It’s an interesting evidentiary work, using Enigma transcripts —

In 1941, British Intelligence analysts cracked the German “Enigma” code. This undermined the German war effort – but also threw new light on day-by-day events in the Nazi concentration camp system. Between January 1942 and January 1943, encrypted radio communications between those camps and the Berlin headquarters were intercepted and decrypted.”

The author Anthony black then added https://www.unz.com/article/terror-on-the-tube-behind-the-veil-of-7-7-review-of-the-book-by-nick-kollerstrom/#comment-4763784

” Thanks for mentioning ‘Breaking the Spell’….a superb volume, and one that I have long thought of doing an ‘overview’ of. Of course, there are many who will simply and mindlessly dismiss Kollerstrom as a ‘Holocaust denier’ when, in fact, his work is a sober, scientific analysis of the latest findings from the last three decades of newly released material, i.e. the British Intel decrpyts, the chemical analyses of samples taken from the walls of the ‘gas chambers’ at Auschwitz, the Bad Arolsen Archive releases, etc. However, in attempting such a project I am only too aware of the likely consequences, i.e. instant and profound condemnation. Indeed, I suspect that just by virtue of having done an essay on a book by Kollerstrom, i.e. ‘Terror on the Tube’, and having nothing to do with the ‘Holocaust’, I have already been blacklisted from many ‘progressive’ sites, e.g. Off-Guardian – with whom I had just prior published two other essays – not only refused to publish this present essay, but cut off all communication with me following my submission. Global Research – again, with whom I had previously published with great success – has refused to accept any further essays from me. This, then, is a subject that is riven with serious risk for any writer or researcher. Still, now that I am retired from my day job…and now that Ron Unz has been good enough to publish some of my more recent essays….I may soon get down to the job of doing the review on ‘Breaking the Spell’. A. Black “

then ‘Truth Vigilante’ added a comment about my book ‘Chronicles of False Flag Terror’ https://www.unz.com/article/terror-on-the-tube-behind-the-veil-of-7-7-review-of-the-book-by-nick-kollerstrom/#comment-4764635 as ‘yet another great read.’

New government legislation enables ‘them’ to come and take your organs when they reckon you are dying, without your consent. They can’t take organs from a corpse, those are no use – it has to be before you are actually dead! See Health Ranger report -https://www.bitchute.com/video/Oru54Qv6pMRg/

Surgeons have a financial motivation to declare you are dead before you have died – may rip your heart out before you are dead! People remain conscious for a couple of minutes after cardiac arrest. Huge profits made by selling organs WITHOUT the permission of the victim /’donor’.

Blood farming and the black market of organ trade – a global trade, organs harvested when you are not really dead! ‘The rise of intense demonic evil infesting the medical profession’ – Health Ranger (speaking on Infowars).

Ditto for ‘partial birth abortions’ – murder the baby and harvest the organs. Chop the baby up, sell it off! That’s why vaccines contain aborted human fetal tissue.

Oxygen-starved organs are not so useful for the organ-transplant industry.

To stop this you have to sign while you are alive, saying NO they can’t do this.

From 2020, adults in England will be considered POTENTIAL DONORS of their organs (eyes, kidney’s etc etc) unless they choose to OPT OUT or are … excluded (for whatever reason) NOTE: * Organs from cadavers CANNOT be used (it errr? means you’re F*ck-all use, if you’re dead! – They have to keep you errrr? ‘alive’ (on a ventilator!) to harvest your organs. This is known as ‘BRAIN DEAD’https://www.gov.uk/…/opt-out-organ-donation-max-and… IF you’re intending to ‘Opt-IN’ … remember what’s ahead, if there’s a 40:60 chance of surviving … (‘md’ comment)

Here s how you can say NO LEAVE MY ORGANS ALONE https://www.organdonation.nhs.uk/register-your-decision/do-not-donate/

Mother shares her experience of giving birth in a hospital –
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IO7sqM_aFjM

Moral – keep clear of hospitals! ‘Here be Vampyres’

Alison Chabloz has been jailed under Section 125 of the Communications Act, on the grounds that she made some ‘grossly offensive’ remarks in a couple of US interviews she did.

She was admittedly talking about the Tribe, always a risky business.

‘He did not wish to go about in Judea because the Jews were looking for an opportunity to kill him.’ – 4th Gospel 7:1. ‘They are not pleasing to God and have made themselves the enemies of all mankind’ – Thessalonians 2:15

Turning to the Act of 2003, it is surely clear that it was designed to regulate public media, not individual blogs. However, the Court took the position, that section 127 of the Communications Act 2003 can apply to ANYTHING on the internet which SOMEBODY deems to be ‘grossly offensive’

The obvious implication is that it is only the Chosen Ones who have the authority to deem some internet statement to be ‘grossly offensive.’

The Verdict sounds kind of rational on one level but is actually pure madness. The claim that someone has been ‘grossly offensive’ on the internet – if that be a crime, then any boundary between innocence and guilt has been utterly dissolved.

Also, pretending that a person being interviewed on a website amounts to sending a message in the sense of the 2003 Communications Act is just so dishonest. Law courts are supposed to look after the meanings of words, not twist them like this.

The Court has claimed that merely posting a link to some satirical song of hers ‘may be defamatory.’

Now in the last century the word ‘crime’ had a meaning and we all knew what it was viz unacceptable harm or loss. It was something which had a victim. And ‘defamation’ was likewise clearly defined, as adversely affecting someone’s professional reputation.

This judgement has killed stone dead the tradition of British comedy. Mind you in these ‘woke’ times it has pretty well been killed anyhow. Satire? Get ready for a prison sentence if it annoys the wrong people.

The charges relate to offensive comments she made about the Holocaust on The Graham Hart Show and Realist Radio in 2019, while she was serving a suspended sentence.

She did not cause anything to be ‘sent’ by being on a US interview and so the 2003 Communications Act is not applicable. ‘the ‘grossly offensive’ charge as a crime comes from Section 127 of the 2003 Communications Act:

“Offences that fall under section 127 of the Communications Act 2003 include the following: A person sending any public electronic communications network a message or other content that is grossly offensive or of an indecent, obscene or menacing character. A person causes any such message or content to be sent….

It is clear from section 127 – 

“(1) A person is guilty of an offence if he— (a) sends by means of a public electronic communications network a message or other matter that is grossly offensive or of an indecent, obscene or menacing character; or (b) causes any such message or MATTER to be so sent.

(2)A person is guilty of an offence if, for the purpose of causing annoyance, inconvenience or needless anxiety to another, he (a) sends by means of a public electronic communications network, a message that he knows to be false, (b) causes such a message to be sent; or (c) persistently makes use of a public electronic communications network.”

By misusing the law in this devious manner the judge has caused great harm to the concept of Justice and destroyed respect for the law. Who is innocent? Has any jury ever agreed that a satirical songwriter be jailed for three months because someone claims to have been offended?

How is it possible that the person bringing the prosecution is the same person who makes the judgement about ‘grossly offensive’ comments?

The media are there to generate hate against her when she cannot reply. the Mail alleges in its headline that Alison had said ‘Hitler was right.’ when did she ever say that and to whom?

The Daily Mail has quickly cut off comments on their article, headed “Anti-Semitic blogger, 56, who believes ‘Hitler was right’ is jailed for 18 weeks for saying Jewish people use Holocaust as ‘eternal cash cow'”.

What Judge Michael Snow said about Alison Chabloz is ‘grossly offensive’, too, and even more so. The same applies to what he said about Julian Assange (https://wikispooks.com/wiki/Michael_Snow) calling him a ‘narcissist’ and telling him to ‘get over to US’ – and ‘pacissifical protesters’, and probably Brian Haw, too (http://brianhaw.tv/index.php/blog/3173-the-bbc-to-try-to-portray-district-judge-michael-snow-job-as-a-snowflake-23-04-2015).

“Anything goes in a court of law, except telling the truth if it is ‘grossly offensive’. The oath should be amended to: “I promise to tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth, unless the truth is grossly offensive”. – Ian Fantom

She’s in Bronzefield women’s prison in Ashford, run by Sodexo Justice Services. According to Wikipedia : “In August 2013, Sodexo Justice Services was criticised in an official report for subjecting a female prisoner to “cruel, inhumane and degrading treatment”, which “appears to amount to torture” at HMP Bronzefield in Ashford, Surrey, UK. The woman was kept segregated from other prisoners in an “unkempt and squalid” prison cell for more than five year

No friends are allowed to visit Ms Chabloz, only close relatives. She will be very much alone I guess.

She’s been banned from posting up her own stuff but we can enjoy this satirical-humour piece of hers, which someone posted up for her, over-writing Elaine Paige:

The harrassment of AC does not stop. For my comments upon an earlier prosecution of her see here.

New UK Intel report

continue reading…

Saturday, March 20th will be the Spring Equinox.

I urge people to come together and burn their facemasks. This is the time to do it! Its way of saying goodbye to the monster hoax we have been though. It all started one year ago with the Lockdown, it was all so sudden and everybody caved in. Now its time to say goodbye to the darkness of winter and the lonely lockdown.

continue reading…

MASSIVE XS OF ENGLISH DEATHS CONTINUES

continue reading…

The situation is not ‘getting better.’ The government is not ‘winning the war.’ All that is happening is that, following the Lockdown, total mortality keeps climbing up and up.

                                 IS THE VACCINE KILLING PEOPLE? 

continue reading…

A British View of the Imposture

2020 saw 14% more deaths than average, last year in England & Wales and that amounted to seventy-five thousand extra deaths. We here use the Office of National statistics figures, as it gives total weekly deaths, and it also gives an average value of corresponding weekly deaths over the previous five years.[1]

continue reading…