TERROR ON THE TUBE

Review of my 7/7/7 book

July 13, 2021 NK No comments

The Unz Review carried a brilliant review of my 2012 book ‘terror on the Tube’ about the London Bombings of 2005, by Anthony C. Black.

In the Comments, Arthur McBride added https://www.unz.com/article/terror-on-the-tube-behind-the-veil-of-7-7-review-of-the-book-by-nick-kollerstrom/#comment-4761174

“”For any who may not know, Nicholas Kollerstrom PhD (History of Science, Astronomy) has also written “Breaking the Spell / The Holocaust; Myth & Reality.”

Now in its 5th edition (2019), Dr Kollerstrom was fired from an honorary teaching post at University College London for publishing this book.
It’s an interesting evidentiary work, using Enigma transcripts —

In 1941, British Intelligence analysts cracked the German “Enigma” code. This undermined the German war effort – but also threw new light on day-by-day events in the Nazi concentration camp system. Between January 1942 and January 1943, encrypted radio communications between those camps and the Berlin headquarters were intercepted and decrypted.”
The author Anthony black then added https://www.unz.com/article/terror-on-the-tube-behind-the-veil-of-7-7-review-of-the-book-by-nick-kollerstrom/#comment-4763784
” Thanks for mentioning ‘Breaking the Spell’….a superb volume, and one that I have long thought of doing an ‘overview’ of. Of course, there are many who will simply and mindlessly dismiss Kollerstrom as a ‘Holocaust denier’ when, in fact, his work is a sober, scientific analysis of the latest findings from the last three decades of newly released material, i.e. the British Intel decrpyts, the chemical analyses of samples taken from the walls of the ‘gas chambers’ at Auschwitz, the Bad Arolsen Archive releases, etc. However, in attempting such a project I am only too aware of the likely consequences, i.e. instant and profound condemnation. Indeed, I suspect that just by virtue of having done an essay on a book by Kollerstrom, i.e. ‘Terror on the Tube’, and having nothing to do with the ‘Holocaust’, I have already been blacklisted from many ‘progressive’ sites, e.g. Off-Guardian – with whom I had just prior published two other essays – not only refused to publish this present essay, but cut off all communication with me following my submission. Global Research – again, with whom I had previously published with great success – has refused to accept any further essays from me. This, then, is a subject that is riven with serious risk for any writer or researcher. Still, now that I am retired from my day job…and now that Ron Unz has been good enough to publish some of my more recent essays….I may soon get down to the job of doing the review on ‘Breaking the Spell’. A. Black “
then ‘Truth Vigilante’ added a comment about my book ‘Chronicles of False Flag Terror’ https://www.unz.com/article/terror-on-the-tube-behind-the-veil-of-7-7-review-of-the-book-by-nick-kollerstrom/#comment-4764635 as ‘yet another great read.’

Uncategorized none

Organ Harvesting 2021 – watch out!

April 24, 2021 NK No comments

New government legislation enables ‘them’ to come and take your organs when they reckon you are dying, without your consent. They can’t take organs from a corpse, those are no use – it has to be before you are actually dead! See Health Ranger report -https://www.bitchute.com/video/Oru54Qv6pMRg/

Surgeons have a financial motivation to declare you are dead before you have died – may rip your heart out before you are dead! People remain conscious for a couple of minutes after cardiac arrest. Huge profits made by selling organs WITHOUT the permission of the victim /’donor’.

Blood farming and the black market of organ trade – a global trade, organs harvested when you are not really dead! ‘The rise of intense demonic evil infesting the medical profession’ – Health Ranger (speaking on Infowars).

Ditto for ‘partial birth abortions’ – murder the baby and harvest the organs. Chop the baby up, sell it off! That’s why vaccines contain aborted human fetal tissue.

Oxygen-starved organs are not so useful for the organ-transplant industry.

To stop this you have to sign while you are alive, saying NO they can’t do this.

From 2020, adults in England will be considered POTENTIAL DONORS of their organs (eyes, kidney’s etc etc) unless they choose to OPT OUT or are … excluded (for whatever reason) NOTE: * Organs from cadavers CANNOT be used (it errr? means you’re F*ck-all use, if you’re dead! – They have to keep you errrr? ‘alive’ (on a ventilator!) to harvest your organs. This is known as ‘BRAIN DEAD’https://www.gov.uk/…/opt-out-organ-donation-max-and… IF you’re intending to ‘Opt-IN’ … remember what’s ahead, if there’s a 40:60 chance of surviving … (‘md’ comment)

Here s how you can say NO LEAVE MY ORGANS ALONE https://www.organdonation.nhs.uk/register-your-decision/do-not-donate/

Mother shares her experience of giving birth in a hospital –
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IO7sqM_aFjM

Moral – keep clear of hospitals! ‘Here be Vampyres’

Uncategorized none

Minstrel sent to jail

April 10, 2021 NK 2 comments

Alison Chabloz has been jailed under Section 125 of the Communications Act, on the grounds that she made some ‘grossly offensive’ remarks in a couple of US interviews she did.

She was admittedly talking about the Tribe, always a risky business.

‘He did not wish to go about in Judea because the Jews were looking for an opportunity to kill him.’ – 4th Gospel 7:1. ‘They are not pleasing to God and have made themselves the enemies of all mankind’ – Thessalonians 2:15

Turning to the Act of 2003, it is surely clear that it was designed to regulate public media, not individual blogs. However, the Court took the position, that section 127 of the Communications Act 2003 can apply to ANYTHING on the internet which SOMEBODY deems to be ‘grossly offensive’

The obvious implication is that it is only the Chosen Ones who have the authority to deem some internet statement to be ‘grossly offensive.’

The Verdict sounds kind of rational on one level but is actually pure madness. The claim that someone has been ‘grossly offensive’ on the internet – if that be a crime, then any boundary between innocence and guilt has been utterly dissolved.

Also, pretending that a person being interviewed on a website amounts to sending a message in the sense of the 2003 Communications Act is just so dishonest. Law courts are supposed to look after the meanings of words, not twist them like this.

The Court has claimed that merely posting a link to some satirical song of hers ‘may be defamatory.’

Now in the last century the word ‘crime’ had a meaning and we all knew what it was viz unacceptable harm or loss. It was something which had a victim. And ‘defamation’ was likewise clearly defined, as adversely affecting someone’s professional reputation.

This judgement has killed stone dead the tradition of British comedy. Mind you in these ‘woke’ times it has pretty well been killed anyhow. Satire? Get ready for a prison sentence if it annoys the wrong people.

The charges relate to offensive comments she made about the Holocaust on The Graham Hart Show and Realist Radio in 2019, while she was serving a suspended sentence.

She did not cause anything to be ‘sent’ by being on a US interview and so the 2003 Communications Act is not applicable. ‘the ‘grossly offensive’ charge as a crime comes from Section 127 of the 2003 Communications Act:

“Offences that fall under section 127 of the Communications Act 2003 include the following: A person sending any public electronic communications network a message or other content that is grossly offensive or of an indecent, obscene or menacing character. A person causes any such message or content to be sent….

It is clear from section 127 –

“(1) A person is guilty of an offence if he— (a) sends by means of a public electronic communications network a message or other matter that is grossly offensive or of an indecent, obscene or menacing character; or (b) causes any such message or MATTER to be so sent.

(2)A person is guilty of an offence if, for the purpose of causing annoyance, inconvenience or needless anxiety to another, he (a) sends by means of a public electronic communications network, a message that he knows to be false, (b) causes such a message to be sent; or (c) persistently makes use of a public electronic communications network.”

By misusing the law in this devious manner the judge has caused great harm to the concept of Justice and destroyed respect for the law. Who is innocent? Has any jury ever agreed that a satirical songwriter be jailed for three months because someone claims to have been offended?

How is it possible that the person bringing the prosecution is the same person who makes the judgement about ‘grossly offensive’ comments?

The media are there to generate hate against her when she cannot reply. the Mail alleges in its headline that Alison had said ‘Hitler was right.’ when did she ever say that and to whom?

The Daily Mail has quickly cut off comments on their article, headed “Anti-Semitic blogger, 56, who believes ‘Hitler was right’ is jailed for 18 weeks for saying Jewish people use Holocaust as ‘eternal cash cow'”.

What Judge Michael Snow said about Alison Chabloz is ‘grossly offensive’, too, and even more so. The same applies to what he said about Julian Assange (https://wikispooks.com/wiki/Michael_Snow) calling him a ‘narcissist’ and telling him to ‘get over to US’ – and ‘pacissifical protesters’, and probably Brian Haw, too (http://brianhaw.tv/index.php/blog/3173-the-bbc-to-try-to-portray-district-judge-michael-snow-job-as-a-snowflake-23-04-2015).

“Anything goes in a court of law, except telling the truth if it is ‘grossly offensive’. The oath should be amended to: “I promise to tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth, unless the truth is grossly offensive”. – Ian Fantom

She’s in Bronzefield women’s prison in Ashford, run by Sodexo Justice Services. According to Wikipedia : “In August 2013, Sodexo Justice Services was criticised in an official report for subjecting a female prisoner to “cruel, inhumane and degrading treatment”, which “appears to amount to torture” at HMP Bronzefield in Ashford, Surrey, UK. The woman was kept segregated from other prisoners in an “unkempt and squalid” prison cell for more than five year

No friends are allowed to visit Ms Chabloz, only close relatives. She will be very much alone I guess.

She’s been banned from posting up her own stuff but we can enjoy this satirical-humour piece of hers, which someone posted up for her, over-writing Elaine Paige: