AssadGas‘Beautiful babies were cruelly murdered’

– President Donald Trump, 6 April.

– yeah, blonde Syrian kids, sure. The way to Trump’s heartstrings: *blonde* Syrian kids. (father cradles kids killed in Idlib gas attack’)

Here’s a good intro:

Then the guy in what is alleged to be a hospital receiving all the gas victims turns out to be from Stratford in East London: # He’s been tried as a jihadist. Knowing this, how could the UK Government possibly endorse this story? MI6 says he’s a ‘committed Jihadist’ – so probably not a real doctor.

The NATO propaganda outfit called ‘White Helmets’ seems to have set up this story – as well-exposed by a Swedish medical group:

 Summarising their findings, Gordon Duff of Veterans Today wrote:  ‘Swedish Medical Association Says White Helmets Murdered Kids for Fake Gas Attack Videos.’ Of the White Helmets VT says: ‘this is a “Deep State” organization, a melding of CIA, al Qaeda and Britain’s intelligence services.’ Supposedly an independent NGO, it receives up to $100m p.a. from the CIA and UK Foreign Office “dark project” funding. The Chair of this Swedish medical group, Professor Prof. Marcello de Noli, published at the beginning of March 2017 the shocking indictment: “Swedish Doctors for Human Rights: White Helmets video, macabre manipulation of dead children and staged chemical weapons attack to justify a No-fly Zone in Syria.”

For White Helmets faking the story, and NO sarin gas, see here.

Assad: it was all faked

In an interview with Agence France Presse in Damascus on April 12th, Assad said it was “not clear” whether an attack on Khan Sheikhun had even happened. “You have a lot of fake videos now,” he said. “We don’t know whether those dead children were killed in Khan Sheikhun. Were they dead at all?”

Our impression is that the West, mainly the United States, is hand-in-glove with the terrorists. They fabricated the whole story in order to have a pretext for the attack. … There was no order to make any attack, we don’t have any chemical weapons, we gave up our arsenal a few years ago…. Definitely, 100% for us, it’s fabrication.


ANALYSIS by retired Col.  Patrick LANG, DIA

Donald Trump’s decision to launch cruise missile strikes on a Syrian Air Force Base was based on a lie.  In the coming days the American people will learn that the Intelligence Community knew that Syria did not drop a military chemical weapon on innocent civilians in Idlib. Here is what happened.

  1. The Russians briefed the United States on the proposed target. This is a process that started more than two months ago. There is a dedicated phone line that is being used to coordinate and deconflict (i.e., prevent US and Russian air assets from shooting at each other) the upcoming operation.

  2. The United States was fully briefed on the fact that there was a target in Idlib that the Russians believes was a weapons/explosives depot for Islamic rebels.

  3. The Syrian Air Force hit the target with conventional weapons. All involved expected to see a massive secondary explosion. That did not happen. Instead, smoke, chemical smoke, began billowing from the site. It turns out that the Islamic rebels used that site to store chemicals, not sarin, that were deadly. The chemicals included organic phosphates and chlorine and they followed the wind and killed civilians.

  4. There was a strong wind blowing that day and the cloud was driven to a nearby village and caused casualties.

  5. We know it was not sarin. How? Very simple. The so-called “first responders” handled the victims without gloves. If this had been sarin they would have died. Sarin on the skin will kill you. How do I know? I went through “Live Agent” training at Fort McClellan in Alabama.

Trump: “ He will be impeached, I believe, once Congress is presented with irrefutable proof that he ignored and rejected intelligence that did not support the myth that Syria attacked with chemical weapons.”


ANALYSIS by former CIA Intel officer Philip Giraldi

“I’m hearing from sources on the ground in the Middle East, people who are intimately familiar with the intelligence that is available who are saying that the essential narrative that we’re all hearing about the Syrian government or the Russians using chemical weapons on innocent civilians is a sham.”

Giraldi said his sources were more in line with an analysis postulating an accidental release of the poison gas after an Al Qaeda arms depot was hit by a Russian airstrike.

“The intelligence confirms pretty much the account that the Russians have been giving … which is that they hit a warehouse where the rebels – now these are rebels that are, of course, connected with Al Qaeda – where the rebels were storing chemicals of their own and it basically caused an explosion that resulted in the casualties. Apparently the intelligence on this is very clear.”

Giraldi said the anger within the intelligence community over the distortion of intelligence to justify Trump’s military retaliation was so great that some covert officers were considering going public.

“People in both the agency [the CIA] and in the military who are aware of the intelligence are freaking out about this because essentially Trump completely misrepresented what he already should have known – but maybe he didn’t – and they’re afraid that this is moving toward a situation that could easily turn into an armed conflict,” Giraldi said before Thursday night’s missile strike. “They are astonished by how this is being played by the administration and by the U.S. media.

because Trump and his administration are now committed to convincing Americans that Assad really was responsible for Tuesday’s poison-gas tragedy, the prospects for a full and open investigation are effectively ended. 

Assad, who’s finally regaining territory from ISIS after six years of bloodshed, has absolutely nothing to gain from launching a gas attack which his political enemies in Saudi Arabia and the West could use to justify his overthrow and execution.

Déjà Vu

It’s all happened before back in 2013.

Let’s go back to my earlier analysis of the Syria Gas hoax of 2013: it used actors, pretending t0 be gassed,  and Putin well described Washington’s allegations about the Syrian government’s use of chemical weapons against civilians were “unimaginable nonsense:”

Common sense speaks for itself – government troops are advancing, in some regions they surrounded the insurgents … In such conditions, giving a trump card to those who have always been calling for a foreign military intervention is simply unimaginable nonsense….Claims that the proof exists, but is classified and cannot be presented to anybody are beneath criticism.”

That well applies to the present deception. Yes, poison gas has been released as a result of Syrian government plane bombing a rebel stronghold – but it was organophosphate not Sarin. There is an urgent need for some team to go in and get traces of the toxin that has afflicted local residents. 

The Obama administration’s CIA analysis that a fatal sarin gas attack in 2013 was a “false-flag” operation intended to sucker President Obama into fully joining the Syrian war on the side of the rebels — and the intelligence analysts’ similar beliefs about Tuesday’s incident. 

In both cases – 2013 and 2017 – there were strong reasons to doubt Assad’s responsibility. In 2013, he had just invited United Nations inspectors into Syria to investigate cases of alleged rebel use of chemical weapons and thus it made no sense that he would launch a sarin attack in the Damascus suburbs, guaranteeing that the U.N. inspectors would be diverted to that case.

War was averted in 2013 by Putin brokering a deal, to destroy all of Syria’s chemical weapons, which was swiftly achieved. 

During the election, Trump pledged to support Assad in fighting ISIS.

 See the Daily Mail on the 2013 Mark I fake Syria gas story.MailStory

NB, the Mail  had to pull this story, but fortunately The Truthseeker has re-posted it.

Assad stays:



Note: Trump’s psyche totally disintegrates after he adopts the ‘Assad must go’ position (here and here).

Russian Electronic Warfare

Disabling of the US Tomahawk Cruise missiles: Only 23 of the 59 reached their target, and the air-hangar bombed was usable a few days after the attack. ‘the Syrian DCA intercepted and destroyed the 34 Tomahawk missiles before they reached the Shayrat air base… Russia’s electronic warfare system was able to disable their GPS, rendering the missiles geographically ‘blind… In the Ukraine and Syria, Russian forces are using high-tech equipment to jam drones and block battlefield communications.’

It all happened at a place called Khan Sheikhoun which is ground zero for the Islamic jihadists who have been at the center of the anti-Assad movement in Syria since 2011.

There is/was no civil war in Syria.

Wise words from Assad

Assad said the American missile strike was “the first proof that it’s not about the President of the United States — it’s about the regime and the Deep State, or the deep regime in the United States.”

He said the Deep State “is still the same, it doesn’t change.”

The president is only one of the performers on their theatre, if he wants to be a leader, he cannot, because as some say he wanted to be a leader, Trump wanted to be a leader, but every president there, if he wants to be a real leader, later he’s going to eat his words, swallow his pride if he has pride at all, and make a 180 degree U-turn, otherwise he would pay the price politically.

said Assad. Asked if he anticipated another U.S. attack, Assad replied:

As long as the United States is being governed by this military-industrial complex, the financial companies, banks, and what you call deep regime, and works for the vested interest of those groups, of course. It could happen anytime, anywhere, not only in Syria.