We’ve just had a four-day trial of British paranormal investigator Richard D. Hall, and the verdict will come out in a month or so. At the Royal Courts of Justice at Aldwych he was tried on a charge of ‘harassment,’ by an alleged victim of the Manchester Arena terror event of 2017, Mr Martin Hibbert. For my earlier accounts of this case, see ‘The Judgement against Richard D Hall (9.2.2024) and also 22 and the Manchester Arena Hoax (27.1.2024) Sky TV did a feature on this Hibbert-Hall case. Hibbert claims to have been impacted by 22 pieces of shrapnel at the Manchester Arena event and, to prove it, he’s got the number ’22’ tattooed on his back. He has no actual scars on his back from the Manchester Arena event – not surprising, as he wasn’t actually there – and will the number ‘22’ on his back do instead?
The entire prosecution case was IMO based on misusing the word ’harassment.’ It would have made sense as a defamation lawsuit and there are subtle legal arguments here, but basically a harassment case can be brought as a civil lawsuit, whereas a ‘defamation’ case would be a criminal charge and require a jury trial. Also the latter would allow Richard to propound his view of what happened that night, which the Establishment might not like. Clearly, what Richard did was within the remit of proper journalistic ethics and no-one was harassed. For more on this, see Ben Enwyn-Jones’ examination of the legal arguments over the four days.
There was, Richard stated, no evidence putting Hibbert or his daughter at the Manchester Ariana Grande concert that night. Whereas, the prosecution lawyer quoted Sir John Saunders, who managed the official Inquest on the event, that CCTV had shown the presence of Mr Hibbert in the arena. No-one had actually seen that CCTV of course, only he, Saunders, had been shown it. We, the British people, are surely fed up with such claims having heard them too often before. If CCTV cannot be shown, then it is not evidence.
Synchronously enough, the well-esteemed investigator Iain Davies had his newly-published book on the Manchester event which features this RDH trial, well titled The Manchester Attack. State-fabricated terror events are indeed an attack – upon us, the common people. It is us who get impacted with the distress of what did not happen, to the end that we live in fear and lose our trust in our fellow-men. We cannot do better than quote Iain’s Amazon blurb for his opus:
The Manchester Arena bombing was a terrible wound inflicted on the psyche of a nation. The loss of life felt immense. The sense of injustice seemed unbearable. Emotions overflowed, threatening to overwhelm us. To question what we were told about the bombing was unthinkable.
Yet one investigative journalist did dare raise questions. Richard D. Hall examined every scrap of evidence. He diligently pored over every single image, every forensic detail, every eyewitness account, every official report, every news story. When he looked the state in the eye, the state blinked.
Ever since his book, Manchester: The Night of the Bang, came out, Hall has been hounded, character-assassinated, labelled a conspiracy theorist, and prosecuted for doing what investigative journalists are supposed to do: boldly confronting and querying the centres of power.
A great deal depends upon the outcome of this case. Do not deny yourself the pleasure of reading Iain’s new book. Let’s quote his conclusion: ‘The “Manchester Attack” was not a suicide bombing in the Manchester Arena. It was an assault on the psyche of the nation.’ I predict that psychology students will come to use Iain’s book, for its study of cognition and how illusion is fostered by narratives of the State.
A Daily Mail hit-piece on Richard called him ‘Britain’s cruellest troll’ and referred to ‘his lies about the Manchester Arena bombing.’ It featured ‘victim’ Lisa Bridgett and found Richard’s motives ‘almost impossible to comprehend.’ I suggest readers go to the online PDF of The Night of the Bang Richard’s five-hundred page book and search in it for Ms Bridgett. Her name appears 31 times, as one of the alleged injured on that night. Had the Mail journalist bothered to do this he might have been better able to comprehend Richard’s motives.
The Mail informed its readers about the horrific harm which the ‘shrapnel-packed blast’ had inflicted upon Ms Bridgett. That is a laughably absurd claim because: (1) The Atrium of the Manchester Arena has a large glass ceiling and large glass doors, which remained undamaged. (2) Therefore, no explosion with shrapnel took place. (3) The explosion of a pyrotechnic device adjacent to the wall did blacken the wall but left no indentations, as shrapnel would have done. (4) therefore, again, there cannot have been shrapnel in what went bang. Thus the dreadful events reported by The Mail did not happen.
It was just fear-porn, created by liars.
Richard is innocent.
Given the way the number 22 thrums though his case in a quite absurd manner (see earlier article) I guess this 4-day trial just had to begin on 22/7.
The media are attempting to portray the case as a preposterous narrative from the depraved mind of one individual, but please note that THREE BOOKS have now been published about the Manchester Arena event, and they are CONCORDANT in their judgement as to what happened:
False Flags over Europe, a Modern History of state-Fabricated Terror 2018 (last chapter) by me,
Manchester – the Night of the Bang, 2020 by R.D .Hall
The Manchester Attack: An Independent Investigation 2024 by Iain Davies
- All available from Amazon!
The brilliant work by Iain Davis signifies a huge sea-change in the whole perception of false-flag terror in which the government is complicit. This is a new thing under the sun!
https://iaindavis.substack.com/p/the-bizarre-trial-of-richard-d-hall
Brilliant interview with James Delingpole – https://delingpole.substack.com/p/iain-davies?utm_source=podcast-email&publication_id=714921&post_id=147915275&utm_campaign=email-play-on-substack&utm_content=watch_now_button&r=il2yb&triedRedirect=true&utm_medium=email
https://iaindavis.com/?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email
Also, enjoy the comments below Iain’s articles, eg –
- Richard’s trial is just about as compellingly relevant as it’s possible to imagine. So many fundamental issues are tied up in this case.
- It’s incredible how our governments and agencies are allowed to get away with this. There is something deeply rotten about the present world order that relies on lies and phantom terror to function.
- …*they* got fed up with doing real bombings, false flags and assassinations due to the sheer number of relatives (particularly mothers) who would not give up trying to find out the truth … So they moved to using paid Crisis actors once they had complete control of the mainstream media and could basically sell a story any way they liked. As for why they do it? If you have to ask that, you are clearly not paying attention.
- I guess since no mention has been made about Eve, that it’s accepted that she’s the same young lady who was photographed with MH in the nearby restaurant before the concert? If so I wonder how she became disabled. Anyone know?
- Breivik attack in Norway 22nd July- Russian attack 22nd March this year, the Glasgow helicopter crash into a bar officially recorded as 22:22 hours on 19/11/13; it is stated that 22 US vets per day kill themselves etc etc – and so it goes. And not forgetting Armistice day is the 11 hour of the 11 month – and equals… Very powerful manifestation numbers and the overlords know it.
-
