TERROR ON THE TUBE

The London 7/7 Bombings: A Murder Investigation

Browsing Posts published by NK

Here is the one decent discussion I’ve seen, over the ‘strange fires’ or ‘DEW fires’ afflicting England. youtube.com/watch?v=SdP4TrE-spo   ‘The United kingdom Vs Maui fires’ by Brush Junkie. Notice at 9 minutes a lorry with only the front engine burnt! That is so like the 9/11 event – the first time the world saw car-parks full of burning cars, mainly the electrical front-engine part, often with the rest of car OK. ‘Thet’s something we se all the time’ the lady states. She notes the way various fires sprung up synchronously.

‘All the trees along the railway track were exploding .. not burning, exploding’ a local tells her. There is a big contrast between this lady from Maui who well understands the DEW ‘strange fires’ phenomenon and the totally-clueless Brits. Zombified, clueless Brits … No, Mr Jones, this isn’t just the weather. At 15 minutes, the eerie sight of a tree burning from the inside.

More than ever, this helps us to appreciate how the 9/11 event is the key to this new millennium.

Here is the same lady ‘Brush Junkie’ a year ago about the californian Wierd fires – or ‘DEW fires  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IetUnvQOmKA – homes burnt to white ash.

Comments upon the Stourbridge fires (16 August):   As in California a few years abck, we see homes gutted by fire, only the outer walls standing, with trees around still OK! People driving cars in the night, not realising the cars were on fire, the wheels burning… We see burnt-out cars, the front engine-part having burnt. I reckon Google is deleting posts about the ‘strangeness’ of the fires, I read one last night and now its gone –  ‘truth’ is only found in the comments!

trees untouched, houses burning, the fires can jump over roads: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=06eJti7NRME   the News calls it ‘wildfires???’ that is ‘extremely misleading’ because,  ‘No trees burning, only houses burning’  is a very different thing!  “The INSANE UK Wildfire That Only Burns Houses”

The Daily Mail did manage to say, “Trees are left scorched beside homes that were completely destroyed in the inferno”

Comments:

“From the pictures I’ve seen, strangely the fires are at the roof area first, solar panels …I was just wondering  (youtube.com/watch?v=5YiU6COoWPs)

“These are not natural “wild fires”. They are man made with Direct Energy Weapons to clear the land for the New World Order’s 15  minute Smart Cities.

“One can see bushes untouched by fire, yet the houses are burnt out – why is that? The same thing happened in California years ago, bushes, trees and plastic dustbins untouched for raging fires; have they been using directed energy weapons?

“I’m from Africa where we had genuine wildfires. These are not wildfires. People need to get a grip

“all the trees along the railway track were exploding. They weren’t just setting fire; they were exploding ” This sounds like an electrical effect related to the railway?

“WHY ARE SO MANY TREES NOT BURNT?

“Also anything BLUE in colour would not burn. The fires in california were the same when the estates burned down. Blue cars , bins, housing roofs and TREES didn’t burn..

for discussion of DEW see https://conspiracytheory.net/theory/directed-energy-weapons-fires/

Andy ‘Burn ’em’ the prime minister, on a visit to Stourbridge, described the country as a “tinderbox right now”,

Compare this US report, of a local community objecting to a AI Data-centre springing up: they successfully blocked it, then in response various local homes nearby BURN DOWN – houses burn, trees around DO NOT burn. youtube.com/watch?v=GskZkkSabGU

Share

On the morning of Easter Sunday the US president posted foul language threatening Iran with destruction if it did not open the Straits of Hormuz. ‘Open the F** strait you crazy bastards or you’ll be living in Hell.’ Then he added the mocking, blasphemous. ‘Praise be to Allah’ This was ON EASTER SUNDAY.

The next day, he posted a tweet promising that the ‘A whole civilisation will die tonight’ – irreversibly.

In any meaningful sense of the word, he is a Satanist.

Let me suggest that indeed a whole civilisation may in fact die. People will soon forget what America ever stood for. And yes it is irreversible.

The true horror of America is a spiritual, moral issue: that around 60% of Evangelical Christians support Trump.

Christianity used to be the guiding moral-ethical force whereby America developed and was sustained. That has through the 20th century morphed into its loathesome, ghastly antithesis: Christian Zionism, which turns the Bible into a real-estate contract. The horror of what Israel is doing is supported by US Christians.

Trump will openly state that he has no interest in international law.

His only moral guiding principal is the Crowleyite ‘do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law.’

Insofar as America survives it will become a horror – a heirarchical, robotic, fascist, zionically-controlled police state. Its tentacles of Zionic pain will attempt to enwrap themselves around our world. For 2027 Trump has asked for a military budget of one and half trillion dollars. All US social welfare programs are being gutted to pay for this.

Let us pray for Iran.

Tuesday, 7th april.

Share

The Green Party at its upcoming spring conference failed to vote on its ‘Zionism is Racism’ motion A105. Its website explains the motion thus:

“The motion urges the Green Party to declare itself an anti-Zionist party…It argues that Zionism underpins what it describes as an apartheid system between the Jordan River and the Mediterranean Sea. …  This motion calls for the Rejection of the IHRA and JDA definitions of antisemitism which have been weaponised to silence legitimate criticisms of the actions of the state of Israel. In its dominant contemporary form, Zionism underpins a system of inequality, dispossession, and violence against Palestinians. continue reading…

Share

Letter of resignation from Green Pary

The Green Party policy over Ukraine supports the UK Govts perpetual-war policy. It urges HM Govt to:

“defend Ukraine’s right to self-determination in the strongest possible terms on the international stage, making explicit that the UK will stand against any bad-faith actors who attempt to bully or intimidate Ukraine into appeasing Russia’s demands. ” (24.2.26)

That is simply an echo of Starmer’s position, which has recently sabotaged the nearly-successful Trump- Putin deal to achieve peace by a compromise solution [That would, basically, have involved accepting and establishing the then-military boundaries of the conflict]. That pro-war position is simply a re-run of what Boris Johnson achieved in April of 2022, when a peace-treaty had been more or less agreed in Istanbul between the warring parties, and he instructed Zelensky not to sign and continue the war- as a consequence of which several hundred thousand Ukrainians have since died. How shocking that the Green Party should now be endorsing this.

What you ignorantly call ‘Russia’s demands’ are the result of the democratic elections of East Ukraine of September 2022, whereby the four ‘oblasts’ (mini-states) – Kherson etc. – voted by overwhelming majorities to leave Ukraine and join the Russian federation – as earlier had Crimea. These are people who have been Russian for a thousand years, who feel they belong to Russia, and were sick of being bombed continually by Kiev ever since 2014. They requested Russia’s aid to rescue them and it did so – eg thanks to Russia the city of Mariopol has now been rebuilt.

A proper Green Party position, in line with its root-policies, (i.e the reason why it exists) should be, that the wishes of the local residents should be paramount. Thus the inhabitants of Luhansk, eg, do they want to go back to the Kiev regime, after being bombed continually (+ denied gas, electricity, water) for so many years – or, are they happy now that they belong to the Russian Federation? I suggest you try to find an answer to that before formulating your pro-war position.

The proper Green Party position should be, that this is a border dispute which does not involve the UK and we should not be supporting Zelensky.  The UK has done more than any other European nation to push Europe towards WW3 in this respect and the GP should be denouncing this not supporting it. In the old days when I worked for the GP, the party was anti-war and anti-NATO, why what a turn-around you have made. I guess you will soon be as ardently pro-war as the German Greens have become. Anyone who disagrees with your pro-perpetual war policy you are describing as ‘bad faith actors’, huh.

A policy in line with the old Green Party – which I used to belong to – would involve reducing military expenditure – from its present sixty billion a year – and spending money instead on rescuing British farming (six thousand UK farms closed last year) and rescuing British pubs (one a day closing last year).

Yours in horror and despair,

NK                                                                                            1.3.26

(author, Ukraine: the Just War, How the West was Lost)

Share

A group of us oldies have been meeting up monthly to debate ‘deep politics’  or counter-culture themes for the last fifteen years – branching off from the old 9/11 truth movement in 2010, as it was dying. Sure we deal with edgy themes but are we far-right? (https://letskeeptalking.home.blog/) ‘Prevent’ wants to thus label our ‘Keeptalking’ group in this way – its new report (x.com/CharlieSimpsonA/status/1959263929470775702) has assembled a bunch of lively discussion forums and labelled them as far-right: continue reading…

Share

Iran has invoked the present conflict, by its continual enrichment of uranium. The ongoing enrichment process is irrational, i.e. it has no purpose, UNLESS Iran may intend to build nukes – unless it wants to leave open the option, of building nukes.

It has a GROWING stockpile of 60% enriched uranium (i.e. with 60% of the fissile isotope, that will go bang). A bomb needs a minimum of 70% for the explosive chain reaction to take place.

This dreadful conflict could have been avoided, if Iran had taken the White House directive: continue reading…

Share

Finally, it seems that the fifty million or so US Christans are abandoning their long love-affair with Israel – well explained by C.J. Werleman: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PBNSwsw1cec. A great storm is now approaching Israel, with more and more people coming to agree with that insightful commentator Larry C. Johnson, that: “”Frankly, Israel needs to cease to exist, because of its murderous conduct. It’s like a cancer in the Middle East in my view.” Well said there Larry! (20.10.25, ‘Netanyahu threatens Putin’)

Likewise, here in the UK, an opinion poll back in February found that only 19% of Britons were favourable towards Israel, while 60% were unfavourable. That is a more than a 3:1 ratio of the British population against Israel. (Yougov poll) So, how come no radio station express that huge-majority view? Virtually no MP will say a word against Israel (an exception, my MP Stella Creasey) – and we have to listen to relentless pro-Israel propaganda from Talk TV on the morning radio?  It gives us only scorn towards the Palestinians and the pro-Palestine demos, it’s just horrific.

Maybe the truth about Israel was expressed on the Ben Fulford column, as follows: “The Zionists are Satan-worshiping demons. They will not stop killing, ever… They have been doing this for over 2000 years; this is why they give sacrifices to their evil god, to continue receiving dark energy,” says an Asian royal. (Weekly Report, 20.10.25) If so, that would mean that the problem cannot be resolved in purely political terms.

continue reading…

Share

Since April 30th, supernatural fires have been burning in Israel, not extinguishable by water-hoses. Cities are being destroyed by them – unreported in the Western media.

They are comparable in some ways to the California fires: houses burned down, trees left standing .

Trees seen to be burning from the inside. Flames seen to come out of the ground. Cars burning.

Intelligent flames.  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tuf2fKKyFuc&t=509s continue reading…

Share

The ‘Dawn Sturgess Enquiry’  https://www.dawnsturgess.independent-inquiry.uk/

Six years after a drug-addict OD’s in Amesbury, the British government is still trying to re-hash its credulity-straining ‘Novichok’ story – with a solid week in London of testimonies being given, in front of about thirty legal types. continue reading…

Share

       We’ve just had a four-day trial of British paranormal investigator Richard D. Hall, and the verdict will come out in a month or so. At the Royal Courts of Justice at Aldwych he was tried on a charge of ‘harassment,’ by an alleged victim of the Manchester Arena terror event of 2017, Mr Martin Hibbert. For my earlier accounts of this case, see ‘The Judgement against Richard D Hall (9.2.2024) and also 22 and the Manchester Arena Hoax (27.1.2024) Sky TV did a feature on this Hibbert-Hall case. Hibbert claims to have been impacted by 22 pieces of shrapnel at the Manchester Arena event and, to prove it, he’s got the number ’22’ tattooed on his back. He has no actual scars on his back from the Manchester Arena event – not surprising, as he wasn’t actually there – and will the number ‘22’ on his back do instead? continue reading…

Share