To obtain copy of my new ‘Who did 9/11?’ book (300 pages) at best price, check here:

Amazon did ban it when I launched it at ‘Create Space’ but I then had the text improved and corrected (thanks to 9/11-expert Mr Stephen Clive) and reprinted it, and may be they are now allowing it:

It has been well-reviewed by the American Herald Tribune.

Synchronously enough, here is a site with the same name.  And, here is another one

My best-selling book or rather short booklet (hundred pages) is ‘How Britain Initiated Both World Wars   It recently had a plug on Veterans Today.   Before that it featured on the Unz Review,   It also got onto the front page of Russian Insider! They improved the title: “Confirmed: Anglos and French Responsible for WWI, the Death-Blow to Western Civilization    Wilhelm II did nothing wrong.”

My new Euro-terror guide (ie, State-fabricated terror – fictional, fake terror)  ‘False Flags over Europe’ isn’t selling too well. I don’t quite get this – For a mere twelve quid, you get a lovely colour book, 260 pages, with dozens of color pictures: the only book to review Euro-terror right up to the 2017 Westminster Bridge episode. There needs to be a European conversation on this topic, because the process it describes whereby Illusion is generated is designed to destroy Europe’s confidence in itself.  But, the black and white version for a few pounds less is selling OK, and maybe people prefer this!

This concludes my ‘Trilogy of Terror’ which started off with Terror on the Tube back in 2012. That trilogy is my definitive statement about what I call the main art-form of the 21st century, viz. state-fabricated terror. I have also done a kindle booklet ‘The Great British Skripal Hoax.’ 

My Rock’n’Roll conspiracy book the Life and death of Paul McCartney 1942-66‘ is still selling well. This is a ‘simple’ story in that it has one guy (‘Paul’) replaced by one other guy (‘Faul’). A joint discussion with Mark Devlin on this topic, went OK. His ‘Musical Truth’ books explore the idea of more than one ‘Faul’ replacement. See my comment here about the Sage of Quai and Faul-Paul replacements.

I’ve had one book published this year by a ‘real’ publisher, Pen and Sword Books: The Dark Side of Isaac Newton This came from my last-century researches, when I was still in Academe as a science historian. I had a dialogue with Jim Fetzer on the topic. You can tell this book has a very different and more ‘academic’ style, before we’d heard about conspiracy theory.

The best-selling Revisionist  book (my publisher advises me) is ‘Breaking the Spell: the holocaust Myth and Reality’ Its now in its 4th Edition  and has been fully updated and corrected, by two top experts. There is also  a German edition. Shhh, keep it a secret, its back on Amazon!  (Or else Here)

But, if perchance it gets re-banned, search for your best-value purchase of a copy at: 

Note, to find the best value for any book purchase, just use that URL with the ISBN.

For a short, easy-to-read book why not try my new, shocking The Great British Skripal hoax

Maybe my books sell because (a) people expect to be disturbed by them, (b) they are decently written, and (c) what I write happens to be true: no-one can refute it.

James McAteer, USA:

I wanted to send you a note to express my appreciation for your research!  So far, I have read the following:  Breaking the Spell, The Life and Death of Paul McCartney,and  How Britain Initiated both World Wars.  I just received your book on 911 from amazon a few weeks ago. I discovered you on youtube and have always wanted to thank you for your work.  Your work is in the spirit of Socrates to question all things and get out of the deceptive matrix!


transcript of Donald Trump’s interview on the day of 9/11 (

Q: Donald, you’re probably the best known builder, particularly of great buildings in the city. There’s a great deal of question on whether or not the damage and the ultimate destruction of the buildings was caused by the airplanes, by architectural defect, or possibly by bombs or aftershock. Do you have any thoughts on that?

DT: Well there was no architectural defect. You know the World Trade Centre was always known as a very very strong building. Don’t forget that took a big bomb on the basement. Now the basement is the most vulnerable place because it’s your foundation. And it withstood that, and I got to see that area about three or four days after it took place, because one of my structural engineers actually took me for a tour ‘cos he did the building, and I said I can’t believe it; the building was standing solid and half of the columns were blown out. And so, this was an unbelievably powerful building. If you know anything about structure, it was one of the first buildings that was build from the outside. The steel: the reason the World Trade Centre had such narrow windows is that in between all the windows you had this steel on the outside. The steel on the outside of the building. That’s why when I first looked there were big heavy I-beams.

When I first looked at it I couldn’t believe it because there was a hole in the steel and this is steel that was – do you remember the windows of the World Trade Centre, folks, – I think, you know, if you were ever up there they were quite narrow, and between was this heavy steel. I said, how could a plane, even a plane, even a 767 or a 747 or whatever it might have been – how could it possibly go through the steel? I happen to think that they had not only a plane but they had bombs that exploded almost simultaneously too, ‘cos I just can’t imagine anything being able to go through that wall. Most buildings are built with the steels around the inside around the elevator shaft. This one was built from the outside, which is the strongest structure you can have and it was almost just like a like a can of soup.

Q: You know, Donald, we were looking at pictures all morning long of that plane coming in to Building Number 2, and when you see that approach the far side, and then all of a sudden, within the matter of a millisecond the explosion pops up the other side.

DT: Right. I just think there was a plane with more than just fuel. I think obviously they were very big planes, they were going very rapidly, because I was also watching where the plane seemed to be not only going fast, it seemed to be coming down into the building, so it was getting the speed from going downhill, so to speak.

It just seemed to me that to do that kind of destruction it’s even more than a big plane, cos you’re talking about taking out steel, the heavies calliber steel that was used on a building. I mean these buildings were rock solid, and, you know, it’s just an amazing, it’s an amazing thing, it’s … This country is different today, and and it’s going to be different than it was for many years to come.

Q: Very profound statement, and very true.