The London 7/7 Bombings: A Murder Investigation

Search Results on lisa french

In 2005, Lisa French (LF) was having an affair with the married police-traffic officer David Rathband (DR) of Northumbria police. The 30 bus in Tavistock Square (see story here, of her on the 30 bus that blew up, then more recently here) she was kicked unconscious by the blast on the top deck of the bus, and was getting therapy. 

continue reading…


The 7/7 Inquest kicked off to a sensation new start in the new year, with bus witness Lisa French recalling the image of Hasib Hussein on the top deck: ‘I made the decision not to go and sit next to him because I was aware we both had very big bags and that he, we, you know, would be taking up a lot of room.’ That shock announcement made headlines around the world – but, why had we never heard about this before? She suddenly becomes famous from what looks like a new memory she has acquired.

Watch the  moving account by Lisa French of the bomb blast at Tavistock Square – given in 2008 or early 2009 (‘three and a half years’ after the event). She was diagnosed as having ‘Post-traumatic stress disorder,’ and given ‘cognitive behaviour therapy’ to try and cope with life. Her husband has suffered from nightmares, from what had happened to her. Her therapist advised her to try and fulfill an ambition – so, she decided to try and jump out of an airoplane, which she did. She also raised some money for charity.

She blacked out at the moment of blast, so doesn’t remember anything, but when she came to people were talking about ‘bomb’ and bus.’ Let’s have a quote here:

 I can remember I woke up feeling very confused, didn’t really know what had happened, but I can remember hearing somebody say “bomb” and “bus” and realising, with the destruction around me, that something very serious had happened.

A year after this detailed account, which has no hint whatever of ‘seeing the terrorist,’ she comes up with detailed memories of going up the stairs behing Hasib Hussein, implying she could recognise him, see him with his large bag sitting down, etc. Did the therapist plant the ‘memory’ in her? She said:

 I went for quite a number of sessions, over 20, with my psychologist, and he performed some cognitive behavioural therapy with me, and also some rapid eye movement therapy, too. The CBT therapy involved some discussion around what had happened and how that made me feel, and also quite a lot of homework.

What Ms French actually told the Inquest, was that the ‘terrorist’ she saw had carried a laptop-bag, large and square-ish, which was not a rucksack; he was either holding it in his hands (as he went up the stairs) or carrying it over one shoulder (Jan 12 am 79:2-7):   

I thought it was just a big laptop rucksack that you could get plenty of other bits and pieces in, really. But it was quite large, sort of square, so I think that’s why I thought it was a laptop bag rather than a camping rucksack because it was still quite square for being a rucksack.

There were two young men at the front of the top deck, with rucksacks – either of them could have been what she was recalling.

Earlier in 2009 she gave an interview (Journal Live, Nov 2nd) entitled ‘ 7/7 bus blast survivor Lisa French meets her saviour.’ Her saviour turned out to be ‘Chris Symonds, the British Transport Police worker who came to her aid and guided her from the wreckage of the red London Transport bus.’ No hint was here given of her having any memory of seeing ‘the terrorist’ – as neither was there when she did the BBC interview (on that same date), where we learnt of the wonderful manner in which she overcame her terror – she had ‘travelled across the world to help other victims of bombings, and also cleared mines in the former killing fields of Cambodia.’ You can watch a brief intro to the BBC’s programme, ‘The remarkable story of the Tyneside woman who survived the 7/7 London bus bomb,’ no longer available. I’ll wager that it did not hint at the Inquest’s story.

In June 2010, Now Magasine published her story, ‘I sat two seats from the Suicide Bomber’ which appears (from a summary) not to be claiming sight of the ‘terrorist.’* Whereas, for the Inquest, the Met have put her five seats in front of ‘Hasib Hussein’ on the top deck. 

There are quite a few earlier media accounts of her mainly concerned with 7/7 anniversaries, eg of how she keeps in touch with Louise Shepherd who was sitting next to her on the bus that morning. 

A New Image of the Bus

This important new image of the blown-up bus was shown at the Inquest. Why was it not released for so long? The very level cut along the top deck, looks a bit as if the top of the bus had been pre-prepared to lift off. It hardly looks like a result of explosion. It’s helpful to compare this with an older image:

Compare these images with the Inquest’s diagram showing all the people on the upper deck:

The dead (here shown in red) are entirely to the right of the collapse-point. Hasib Hussein is shown in purple at position number 53. Click here to find the identity of the people numbered. The top deck of the bus collapsed between the ‘thirties’ (to the left) and ‘forties’ (to the right) using the numbers shown, and the dead are all to the right in this image.*  The bus was packed as it pulled out of Euston, but then many dismounted when it stopped after turning into Upper Woburn Place. There were no standing passengers as it exploded, with most seats occupied.  

 What caused the blast?

Ms Sapna Khimani was sitting immediately behind where the Met have placed ‘Hasib Hussein’ – number 57 in picture. This seat faced the rear, so her back was immediately next to ‘the bomber’ – she was as near to ‘the rucksack’ as was Hasib Hussein. She is today quite alive and well, and gave testimony to the Inquest. (Jan 13th pm, para 26):  

‘Whilst seated on the bus, the next thing I knew is that suddenly there was a bright flash of white light from behind me from left to right. Simultaneously, I felt that on my left side and a fire cracker bang noise, all coming from my left….[She blacked out, then recovered soon after as a medic was taking care of her]  I was not aware of any pain or injury at this time… The next thing was complaining that I was feeling really cold and someone gave me some blankets.

They took Ms Khimani to University College Hospital for a checkup. Unfortunately the barrister Andrew O’Connor cuts off her written report here, from which he was reading. I inquired at the Inquest and was told there was no way the public could obtain the rest of the report – that is unfortunate. If anyone could get a further interview with her it would be of great value. In the meantime I suggest that her account conclusively disproves the notion that a devastating  bomb went off immediately right next to her. She showed no memory of pain, did not have her back broken or destroyed (or we would surely have heard about it) and after blacking out for a short while was well enough to give her husband’s name to a medic who arrived to help her.

Mia Scott was sitting just across from where the Met have placed Hasib Hussein. I suggest that her testimony to the Inquest on monday, 17th January was totally authentic and reliable. The position in which she was sitting on the upper deck of the 30 bus was totally clear, and dispels any idea that the ‘suicide bomber’ was sitting next to her. Consulting the map, she was in seat 56, and just to her right and behind her was allegedly ‘Hasib Hussein.’ Her right leg was somewhat damaged but is now better. Her only permanent damage is to her ears from the blast.

This bus was moving very slowly on a stop-start journey, and it stopped for a while before being able to turn into Upper Woburn Place. In addition the passengers has exciting news to talk about, with reports of strange events and the huge crowds milling around. So various witnesses spoke of a convivial atmosphere  during the quarter of an hour from embarking at Euston to the dreadful blast. Mia Scott told how she got up and looked around her, then looked out of the window. She could correctly identify from memory the various persons around her (her seat faced the back of the bus, to remind you). She rembered and described the ‘two girls’ to her right (in positions 57 & 58) and one of them using her mobile phone, and recalled the ‘Indian gentleman’ at posiyion 60. However, when she was asked if she recalled ‘the bomber’, ‘Hasib Hussein’ and told what seat he was supposed to be sitting in, she just looked worried and replied, ‘No I’m sorry I don’t.’ She  described the ‘muffled bang’ and ‘as if I was floating through air’ (she had been blown onto the street, quite a distance behind the bus, as the barrister told her).

I suggest this testimony from Ms Scott makes the option of a ‘terrorist’ bomber sitting adjacent to her quite unlikely. She claimed she did not lose consciousness and her memory seemed intact. There was no large six-foot high Asian-looking fellow, sweating profusely and with dark glasses (to quote earlier witnesses from the number 91 bus) with a huge rucksack next to her –  he wasn’t there.

Quiz Question:   Here is a fine picture of the bus newly released by the Inquest. We note the perfect symmetry in which ‘blood’ has been spattered around the BMA main entrance – but, is this not too far away from the bus, so how did it get there? (I always tend to assume its pig’s blood…) Note the top of the bus on the road, far right, plus of course the Kingstar van – specialists in controlled demolition – its there in all the  pictures.

P.S. Compare with the J7 analysis, where Lisa French saw another passenger on the top deck, carrying a large bag, and has since been persuaded to ‘remember’ it was Hasib Hussein.


 Five years after the event, we have a judgement from Britain’s High Court:

  • The 7/7 killings were ‘unlawful.’  Uh-huh.
  • Nobody was to blame, except the wicked Four who are dead.
  • A public enquiry into 7/7 would not be a good idea.
  • There is no need for an Inquest into the Four alleged perpetrators.
  • No ‘conspiracy’ would have been possible

We should here remind ourselves, as to the proper purpose of an inquest.

An inquest is meant to come to a judgement concerning cause of death.

In the very strange circumstances of the 7/7 Inquest, Lady Justice Hallett could not do this because no post-portems had been performed upon the 52 dead bodies. continue reading…




The Aldgate Blast

BBC vs Ripple – an academic view

The British Army’s FRR Go Through The Looking-Glass?

Christmas ‘The Inquest’ Pantomime

Entering Luton Station

The Fate of Khan

Fiendish new (nonexistent) UK terror threat foiled

Germaine Lindsay and the Piccadilly Line blast

Germain Lindsay at King’s Cross

How the Tavistock Square bus blew its top

7/7 Inquest: Government offers new (still unbelievable) version of train times

7/7 Inquest: Was someone afraid to reveal the causes of deaths?

The Inquest Begins

The Jaguar at Luton

July 7th – the truth at last

Just a Coincidence …..

Khan widow banned from Inquest

The Last Minutes of Hasib Hussain

Letter to Lady Justice Hallett

Lisa French and the Tavistock Square blast

Magic Numbers and Synchronous Detonations rule out Suicide Bombers

MI5 use of Torture, in Quest for the London Bombings mastermind

Muad’Dib and Ripple

Muslim Terror Trials in the Wake of 7/7

New support for Canary Wharf story

Operation Kratos and the De Menezes Assassination

The phantom image of Khan and the moveable crater

The Phantom Menace

7/7: Practice Makes Perfect

Right next to the ‘bomb’: Shehzad Tanweer and William Walshe

The Terrorist Hunters by Andy Hayman

Towards a 7/7 Inquest?

Tribute to ‘Postman Patel’

Truth from the Daily Mail

Two holes in floor of Edgware Road coach

7/7 Inquest: Was someone afraid to reveal the causes of deaths?

‘War On Terror’ Enterprises Inc. brings you ‘The Singing Babar’

7/7: what went bang?

Related topics

Constructed Terror, on Christmas Day

Eternal War and False-flag Terror (not on this site)

The enigma of Israel embassy bombing, Argentina 1992

The enigma of Israel embassy bombing, London 1994

Euro-police Terror Report, 2009

Help on the 7/7 story from Keith Mothersson

The Heathrow Liquid Bomb Hoax

Little Old England

MI5 Pressure on British Muslims

Treacherous behaviour from Daniel Obachike

Book Reviews

For the Love of Anthony by Marie Fatayi-Williams

‘The Morning Star’ Reviews ‘Terror On the Tube’

Out of the Tunnel by Rachel North, 2007

Progressive Press Books

A Song for Jenny by Julie Nicholson

The Suicide Factory – abu Hamza and the Finsbury Park Mosque




The worst act of violence Paris has suffered since the German occupation during World War II, with over three hundred people in hospital… but, Drills were planned in Paris for that very day: Patrick Pelloux, chronicler at Charlie Hebdo, explained on France Info radio that Paris police were prepared because, “as luck would have it”, they’d planned an exercise to train for multi-site attacks on that very morning, Nov 13,2015.

Here is a response from the day after: “I also knew last night watching KELLY FILE on FOX that the “parade” of “survivors” on camera with Space Blankets looked very fishy – – at least 4 of these people coming out of the Concert Hall were SMILING ? laughing ? would you be smiling after witnessing a blood bath massacre as we’ve been told? People fall back into the same trap and believe the media. Some of it is real. Some of it involved crisis actors….all of it involved the Elite who have been planning this for along time.” – Barbara Joshua.Parisattacks2b

Whatever happened in that music hall continued for one hour before the police started to arrive (Source: survivor testimony I heard on the radio, today the 15th).

A pristine passport found left by a dead terrorist for ID, after he went bang in a football stadium – where have we heard that one before?

Right away, the authorities knew and were proclaiming who had done it. Let’s listen to professor Chossudovsky, on Global Research:

‘Within minutes following the attacks, which were launched simultaneously, and prior to the release of a preliminary report by the police, France’s media went into overdrive. News commentators and intelligence analysts on France’s network TV stated with authority that the attacks emanated from Syria and Iraq…The attacks were described without evidence as an act of revenge and retribution against France for having bombed ISIS strongholds in Syria and Iraq as part of Obama’s counter-terrorism air campaign.

Are we really meant to believe, that  starving, travel weary, ill & weak people with no money, somehow managed to pull off a military-precise attack in five different locations without anyone in the French forces knowing anything? Here is a thoughtful comment made the next morning:

In the very early hours there were no bloody scenes reported, no eye witnesses telling us what happened, lack of activity from emergency responses (I expect to see a mass rush of emergency calls but nothing) ISIS constantly being blamed, captions in the headlines saying immigrants were shouting for Syria when attacks happened and how emergency measure and tighter control will be needed to deal with this threat. All this to me is the call signs of a false flag event and is very similar to the london bombings. Within minutes it’s all being given to us what happened, CCTV footage seems to be hard to come by, it will most likely be confiscated and kept under national security.

Too right!

The Event was predicted – ” Paris Match on October 2nd predicted a French Style 9/11, “un 11 septembre à la française” – and, get this, it was difficult to avoid:  ”impossible a dejouer”! Judge Trévédic explained in that issue of Paris Match.  ”The attacks in France will be on  a scale comparable to 9/11.″

Shortly before midnight on that same day November 13, France’s president announced drastic police state measures against an alleged terrorist network operating nationwide. He surely did not take that decision spontaneously that evening –  prior to the holding of any cabinet meeting.  His speech averred that jihadists were behind the attacks, but gave no evidence from from police sources to support his claim. Let us notice his words:

This is a terrible ordeal which once again assails us. We know where it comes fromwho these criminals are, who these terrorists are. 

That is almost identical to the phrase Tony Blair used, on the afternoon of 7/7!

 On the Rue de la Fointaine au Roi in the 11th arrondissement a gunman opened fire on patrons inside a cafe. From a Guardian report:

“He was standing in a shooting position,” Colclough said. “He had his right leg forward and he was standing with his left leg back. He was holding up to his left shoulder a long automatic machine gun. It was fully intentional, professional bursts of three or four shots. Everything he was wearing was tight, no zippers or collars. Everything was toned black. A man in military uniform, black jumper, black trousers, black shoes or boots and a machine gun.”

Despite the heightened security around Paris in the wake of Charlie Hebdo, despite the prediction a month before that something like this could happen, a man dressed all in black could walk along a street carrying a machine-gun, set it up, and start spraying restaurant-customers …. and then get away. He killed five or six diners. Needless to say, while shooting he was heard to shout, ‘Allah Akbar!’

French media immediately started comparing the November 13 attacks in Paris to 9/11, intimating that France was at war and that the alleged Islamic State attack was from abroad, i.e. the Middle East. Without debate in France’s National Assembly, a State of Emergency was declared throughout France – lockdown under military law.

The attack included a football stadium at which the President was attending – hardly a coincidence: foreknowledge of his location would have required significant planning and preparation.

There is the wider geo-political perspective: “The attacks will, by necessity, need to be linked to the Syrian conflict to justify the recent appearance of France’s largest warship, the nuclear-powered aircraft carrier, the Charles de Gaulle, off the coast of Syria, and the much larger Western military intervention needed in order to save a proxy war that has been all but lost by the West.”-

This large-scale event has to be, state-sponsored terror, but by whom? “The scale of the attack is that of a military operation. It would have required a large group of well trained militants, well armed and funded, with experience in planning and executing coordinated military operations, moving large amounts of weapons clandestinely, experts in the use of weapons and explosives, as well as possessing intelligence capabilities used to somehow circumvent France’s increasingly colossal surveillance capabilities.

“Like the terrorists and their supply lines pouring out of NATO-territory into Syria itself, clearly with immense state sponsorship behind them, those involved in the most recent attacks in Paris are also clearly the recipients of state-sponsored funding and training.” (Tony Cartalucci, Global Resarch)

 A prediction was made just one week beforehand, that terror would strike France – as a clandestine CIA attack.

CryingShameThis happened on Friday 13th, and only a few days earlier was Halloween, when the Russian civilian plane was shot down.

Paul Craig Roberts received

a report from European security that there was a massive cyber attack on French systems 48 hours prior to and during the Paris attacks. Amongst other things, the attack took down the French mobile data network and blinded police surveilance This was …a sophisticated attack that targeted a weakness in infrastructure hardware. Such an attack is beyond the capability of most organizations and requires capability that is unlikely to be in ISIL’s arsenal. An attack on this scale is difficult to pull off without authorities getting wind of it. The coordination required suggests state involvement.

Indeed. And this is the only explanation we are likely to receive, as to why shooters should be able to spend a whole hour in a crowded theatre killing people – before police arrived.

Two of the reported dead in the Bataclan music theatre have turned out to be still alive. Police showed up at his family home to report his death.

The claim that this was an attack by ISIl cannot be taken seriously. For a start here is Obama admitting that the US was training and equipping ISIL:

The signature

Quoting from The Times of Israel, the Jewish owners of the  Bataclan theatre, who had had it for forty years, decided to sell shortly before this event – and did so on September 11th. They were quite strongly pro-Zionist, holding Israeli-type events there, and they emigrated to Israel after selling it. The co-owner Joel ‘told Channel … he took a call from the theater at the time of the attack and I could hear the gunfire.’ He added that a member of the Eagles of Death Metal was “hit by a bullet and killed.” “There is blood everywhere,” he said. “It will take three days just to clean that up.” Well thanks for all that info!

So, after selling it, they just happened to be on the phone to the new owners, and he could hear the gunfire.Would the new owners really wish to phone Israel at such a moment? Those who design these events remain hidden, but they cannot resist adding their signature, to their masterpiece,  as it were.

Of course the ‘Jewish community’ in Paris knew of the event on Friday morning. Well you would, wouldn’t you? Of course.jewinsider‘Just Friday, security officials in france’s Jewish community  were informed…’ wrote The Times of Israel the very next day November 14th. But, that paper seems to have had doubts, had they not gone too far? So online that text was altered to ‘for months, security offiiclas….’

That is the signature. Those are the perps. Its the usual story.

The Fateful Date

13.11.15, or 11/13/15 in US terms, a sequence of odd numbers.A year earlier, on November 20th, The Economist published their ‘The World in 2015’ issue. Its front cover was widely surmised to contain Iluminati symbolism. Here is its bottom right-hand corner:economist_magazine_jan2015

Next to Alice are two arrows, with numbers on them,11.3 and 11.5. These have no obvious meaning, but unscrambling them gives the above date, does it not? Nothing else happeend in 2015 relating to these numbers. They are writtenj on arows, indicating somethng lethal. And thet are by the feet of Alice, indicating ‘going through the looking glass’ – alluding to the  mirror-delusion proces where by the State creates the Enemy that citizens hate and fear.

On October 25, 2015, Michael Snyder posted an article predicting that “The World in 2015” Economist magazine cover might foreshadow a false flag event in November – as indeed it has.

View of Ken O’Keefe:

The thing that is most important with regard to the latest manipulation in Paris is not whether it is a hoax or not.  It is however a very interesting issue, that I will not deny.  But the most important matter is that this is a manipulation, staged or not, and those responsible are as always, very easy to identify because essentially they all work for the same masters, whether they know it or not.  Getting caught up in technical issues that are truly inferior to the bigger issue of what is at play is a mistake in my view.  I am in no way saying we should not look at every angle, hoax, not a hoax, Mossad/CIA responsibility, Russia in on it or not, etc., indeed we should, but let us not be distracted by issues that are more of a footnote then a primary issue of the event.  It is an active attempt to manipulate us into yet more war and always it is based on lies, this is the most important matter and we need to guide people to the primary relevance of this fact and not let details marginalise this critical for humanity understanding.

Aside from that it is in my opinion a classic false flag, hoax or not.  It is yet another “evil Muslims did it” manipulation.  Even if those who carried it out are “ISIS” dipshits who were just successfully shepherded to carry out their silly little delusional “jihad”, while probably having no idea at all who they actually work for, it is still a classic state orchestrated false flag.  This is not blow back, which means unfortunate and unwanted; this is most definitely wanted and encouraged if not overtly carried out by our so-called “intelligence” services.  The big white gunman being a pretty good sign of this.  The bottom line is no matter what the details it is just another sad and transparent act that is consistent with the agenda of setting the Middle East alight and fostering a third world war by fanning the flames of a clash of civilisations.  That theme/agenda is primary.  How it ties into Greater Israel is also, in my opinion, hugely relevant and critical for people to learn (18 Nov.)

More emerges about the Drill on that same day –

FRENCH MEDIA GRILLS OFFICIALS OVER EXACT SCENARIO OF NOVEMBER …More footage has come to light where Parisian officials are openly admitting to French media that an exercise was being carried out the day of the Paris attacks…






The worst act of violence Paris has suffered since the German occupation during World War II, with over three hundred people in hospital… but, Drills were planned in Paris for that very day: Patrick Pelloux, chronicler at Charlie Hebdo, explained on France Info radio that Paris police were prepared because, “as luck would have it”, they’d planned an exercise to train for multi-site attacks on that very morning, Nov 13,2015.

continue reading…


The roof neatly lifted off, when the No. 30 bus blew up in Tavistock Square, that morning.  A bit too neatly.

It had been cut.

We can see the cut-line along the base of the upper roof support:

This was discovered by the American Simon Shack, in October 2010 – continue reading…


Daniel Obachike has been claiming for the last four years that he was on the 30 bus in Tavistock Square when it blew up – and he wrote his book The 4th Bomb about it. But, many have been sceptical. His claim has now been vindicated by the Inquest putting him on the lower deck of that bus. See here  how seat number 6 has ‘Daniel Michael Adigwe’ sitting there, that’s his real name. continue reading…

Powered by WordPress Web Design by SRS Solutions © 2019 TERROR ON THE TUBE Design by SRS Solutions