Charlie Hebdo video: my talk

http://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2017/05/22/herm-m22.html

French President: The Illuminati did this, Muslims did not do it.

In an astounding broadcast, President Francois Hollandais has has told this to the people of France on national television, on 9th January the day after the Paris terror attacks:

Those who have committed these actions, these terrorists, these illuminati, have nothing to do with Islam. (‘Ceuc qui ont commis ces actes, ces terroristes, ces illumines, ces fanatiques, n’ont rien a voir avec la religion Muslim’)

Listen, O people of France, to what your President has told you! The ‘illuminati’ has always traditionally alluded to the Masonic orders which are very strong in France, to a hidden elite of Judaeo-Masonic bankers.

Muslims did not do it – let’s say that loud and clear, as the opinion of France’s President. This could be a turning-point in tbe history of state-fabricated terror.  

Let’s hope this video of France’s president doesn’t get deleted – so many videos are being scrubbed from Google on this topic. Has the worm turned at last? Are the puppets getting tired of their puppet-masters?

The Turkish premier has made a comparable statement, telling the press on monday 12th January:

Mossad is definitely behind such incidents . . . it is boosting enmity towards Islam. The duplicity of the west is obvious: As Muslims we have never sided with terror or massacres:racism, hate speech, Islamophobia are behind these massacres…. The culprits are clear: French citizens undertook this massacre and Muslims were blamed for it.”

He  linked the attacks to French moves towards recognising Palestine.“Games are being played throughout the Islamic world” he said, and expressed bewilderment that French intelligence services had not followed the culprits more effectively.

Turkey is a NATO member! Mr Erdogan is a former Prime Minister and current President of Turkey.

A Warning from Israel

On December 2nd, the France Parliament passed a resolution asking that France recognize a Palestinian state. Its lower house voted to recognize Palestine, 339 MPs voting in favour and 151 against. Now Palestine is in the International Criminal Court, poised to take down Israel for genocide.

One week before the event, Israel informed France that it was “deeply disappointed” with France’s vote on a UN resolution that would have required Israeli forces to withdraw to their pre-1967 borders by 2017.

The News Storypolice car shoe

On 7 January 2015, at about 11:30 am, two masked gunmen forced their way into the offices of the French satirical newspaper Charlie Hebdo in Paris, France,  screaming “Allahu Akbar” and killing twelve people, including the editor Stéphane “Charb” Charbonnier, seven other Charlie Hebdo employees, and two National Police officers, and wounding eleven others. (The newspaper had attracted worldwide attention for its scurrilous depictions of the prophet Mohammed.)

That didn’t stop the next edition from coming out, selling a million copies, its biggest sale ever – with of course a frontpage caricature of the Prophet Mohammed.

Figure: Note shoe beside car!  Hope someone gets told off for that.

The terrorists then escaped completely, while shooting at police all over Paris. They seemed calm, well trained and handled the automatic firearms with experience.

Police reportedly made seven arrests, mostly acquaintances of the two main suspects – Cherif and Said Kouachi. Despite both being under watch by French security forces, they managed to execute Wednesday’s attack with military precision, unobstructed in one of the world’s most heavily policed cities. Military forces were searching for both men, reportedly veterans of Obama’s war on Syria and brought back for what looks like a classic false-flag attack. How else could two men under security watch successfully execute a commando-like attack in broad daylight, then leave the crime scene with apparent ease? They dispatched a police vehicle with multiple shots in its windshield, killed two policemen, wounded another, then drove off unhurried in their car, according to reports.

They headed north, abandoned their car for another and quickly left Paris. UK media reported 12 deaths and another 20 wounded, five being critical. Manhunt operations continue but both men remain free with Paris put on maximum terror alert with civil liberties suspended, widespread searches, cars stopped, homes entered etc.

A total of twenty people were killed at four locations between 7 and 9 January, including the three suspects. At least twenty-one others were injured, some critically. The attacks are the deadliest act of terrorism in France for over fifty-four years. Police state rules are governing Paris – much like how greater Boston was locked down after the April 2013 marathon bombings.

One of the ‘terrorists’ invading the Charlie Hebdo office had ‘beautiful blue eyes’ a staff member recalled. She was recalling the pseudo-Muslim threat made to her, “Recite the Koran and I will let you live.”

Anomalies

Police chief investigating the event suddenly ‘commits suicide’ – Helric Fredou – in his office, just before competing his report. Perhaps his theories weren’t quite right? His Mother has been told, she will not get to see any autopsy report.

The main office of the Charlie Hebdo journal was attacked within two hours after it posted an image depicting so called ‘ISIS’ chief-cum-actor, Abu Bakr Al-Baghdadi, (trained by Mossad for a year, as revealed by leaked Snowden documents). How could the perps know that was about to happen? A major journal staff meeting was going on at the time: to gain entry they had to know the locale of the staff and to manage their entry and exit, and the offices already had police guards in place.

The Hebdo attackers acted with military precision wearing bulletproof vests, they were well-trained for their mission. One of the attackers Said Kouachi left his ID in the getaway car – which also conveniently contained jihaidist flags and molotov cocktails. What kind of criminals would b well-disguised and yet take their ID – and leave it in a car?

 Sporadically shouting “Allah Akbar” throughout the duration of their onslaught, the two attackers were caught on video making a spectacle of themselves as they paraded down the Paris street guns blazing. It is typically unusual for terrorists to immediately make it known who they are and what they stand for before concluding their dirty work, an anomaly the mainstream media refuses to emphasize for obvious reasons. – Voice of Palestine

The perpetrators escaped and have not been captured, yet somehow the French police identified them within hours. One of the attackers  “was trained” at an Al-Qaueda camp in Yemen in 2011 according to a top US official. How come a US official suddenly knows about this case?

No bloody photos are seen, not even fake blood, not even from a police officer who was shot lays on the sidewalk for 10 seconds before being “shot” a second time – still no blood. (Jim Stone)

A well-photographed scene shows no blood on policemen when shot on the pavement. E-mail forums discussed how Youtube videos of this scene rapidly, vanished in the wake of the event. I’ve never seen videos vanish so fast as these ones have done! I enclose one here but it may go too. Video sequences show the AK-47 rifle being shot with no recoil, no blood on pavement – clearly actors are here involved.

The road miraculously had no traffic – the scene is set up as if staged. In fact the area was cordoned off from about 8.30 that m orning, acording to a local testimony. – he was told it was for the purpose of making a movie – which is what they did! The “terrorists” simply parked in the middle of the road because they knew there would be no traffic. Notice a shoe next to the ‘getaway’ car – as if the actors did not have time to change their shoes properly. The car parks by a black line drawn on the road, the marker for where they were told to stop.

Amchai Stein, the deputy editor of Israeli IBA Channel 1, just happened to be at the scene and has been posting photos of the shooting. All video initially posted was shot from rooftops. FOR A SCENE THAT LASTED LESS THAN A MINUTE. How did anyone get up to the roof that fast to get video of this, times several people shooting from different places? The roof tops were just regular roof tops with no reason for anyone to be up there. It is not like there was a roof top Starbucks or something. Why were people up there to begin with –wearing bullet-proof flak jackets – and how did they figure out what was going to happen and have their cell phones all ready to shoot video from perfect angles? (Jim Stone)

One suspect the 18-year old Hamyd Mourad handed himself to the police at around 11pm after he saw his name mentioned on the news. Friends have said that he has an alibi, as they claim he was present in the classrooms that day. Will this get him off? Such testimony didn’t help the Boston Bombing suspects. Shades of the 8 still-alive 9/11 ‘terrorists’

Staged Video of Phoney Shootout


Comments: This camera was set up before the staged-drama began. Even the police getting out of the car was captured in full, why would anyone have a camera ready and rolling to capture a scene when they were not supposed to even know it was going to happen?

The ‘bad guys’ should have been running away and trying to escape – it makes no sense for them to pull up for no reason, get out of the car and finish off the hurt policemen. The officer falls down for the first part of the show, and to prove how bad the terrorists are, is “killed” while wounded and laying down. As a staged drama, it makes them look ‘wicked’ to stop the car and kill a defenceless policeman.

In the video, we see far too much white smoke coming out of guns – blanks produce all that white smoke, loaded rounds do not.

No blood anywhere on the pavement – shades of the Lee Rigby fake death in UK! Although the instant of shooting is whited out, we still see the blood-free aftermath.

We hear too much echo in the sound of blanks being fired. Also at that close range the head would have been blown open. Note no ricochet effect when the gun is fired.

Who Benefits?

With France taking measures decisively sympathetic to Islam, why would Muslim zealots suddenly choose THIS MOMENT to murder a dozen French citizens, an act that would certainly turn French public opinion against Muslims and in favor of Israel? Israeli complicioty is always hidden, but it will leak out: an Isreali newspaper was the first to deliver information about the Kouachi’s identity, tweeting in many hours before the local French newspapers.

Dynamite in Jewish Grocery Store

The suspect in policewoman shooting entered at ‘random’ a Kosher (Jewish) grocery in the Port de Vincennes  district of Paris and took up to 14 hostages, where at least  four of them are alleged to have been killed by the gunman. Police claim they found 15 sticks of dynamite inside the store after they stormed the shop. A video of the police outside that store makes it clear they are firing blanks.

That gave Israeli premier Benjamin Netanyahu the opportunity enter the story – he hates to be left out of these kind of events – requesting the French President Francois Hollande to “keep up the increased security on Jewish institutions even after things return to normal.”

While the chief suspect, Amedy Coulibaly is killed along with several of his hostages, his accomplice Hayat Boumeddiene has evaded capture – despite being surrounded by literally hundreds of police and security personnel with the whole district locked down and the site of the siege was under intense scrutiny. The police, TV cameras, police helicopters etc. were all watching yet somehow Coulibaly’s partner and accomplice at the scene of the siege managed to escape undetected. Was she allowed to escape and maybe even assisted because she was Amedy Coulibaly’s handler? Or, was she maybe out of the country?  She had lived with Amedy Coulibaly for several years. Of course, she just had to end up in Syria, I mean where else?

Film of this event shows a lot of armed police gathering outside the supermatrket, which is closed. Amedy Coulibaly is reported to be holding hostages in there. A metal grille then rises to open it and the police all start firing into the shop, and start to enter it. There seems to be no returnv fire and it is unclear who the police are firing at. Then a man tries to leap out, with his hands tied together – and falls on the ground. There is no weapon in his hands and yet the police continue shooting him! Clearly they did not want him still alive for questioning! That would have been most inconvenient. as Craig Roberts commented, “The connection between Muslim murderous ire against French cartoonists and Coulibaly’s alleged attack on a Kosher deli is asserted but not explained.”

Aftermath

Very quickly,  “I am Charlie” events were put on across France, in fact ‘Je Suis Charlie’ was going strong on the radio by about 11 30GMT (12. 30 Paris time) – only one hour after the event (11.30 pm CET)! Massive rallies were quickly staged, with many signs printed. An ailing satire mag suddenly prints a million magazines – far more than the usual number – after its staff have been shot, going out to stores to handle excess demand caused by this stunt.

Videos have been quickly removed from web on gounds of “disgusting content”, which is apparently code-speak for “embarrassing revelation that undermines the official story.”

This event ‘bears all the hallmarks’ of state-fabricated terror with major Israeli input. Use of actors, a poorly-done staged shootout, pre-prepared photographers, no possible motive for Islamic attack just as France adopts pro-Palestine position, detailed knowledge of security and timing of journal staff meeting, a perfect escape etc. Also leaving ID in a car with other ‘Islamic’ gear – ‘clues’ – surely journalists are not going to fall for that? Then the road being cordoned off beforehand, kept traffic-free, just like the Lee Rigby event. An Israeli news editor all ready to photograph the event exactly resembles the ‘dancing Israelis’ who set up to photograph the 9/11 event beforehand, as they explained on Israeli national TV.

Comment by Craig Roberts, spot-on as usual: “French President Francois Hollande this week said that the sanctions against Russia should end. This is too much foreign policy independence on France’s part for Washington…. the attack on Charlie Hebdo was an inside job and people identified by NSA as hostile to the Western wars against Muslims are going to be framed for an inside job designed to pull France firmly back under Washington’s thumb.”

The Far Right gets it Right

The French nationalist leader  Jean-Marie Le Pen commented: It was the work of American or Israeli agents, an“intelligence agency” working with the connivance of French authorities, to foment a civil war between Islam and the West. As a conjecture he said, “The shooting at Charlie Hebdo resembles a secret service operation … I don’t think it was organised by the French authorities but they permitted this crime to be committed.” Spot-on!  From now on, the Nationalist community is not following the kosher narrative…

One is reminded of the Breivic Oslo event, when the Norwegian government was advocating sanctions against Israel; or the Fukashima event when Japan was likewise adopting criticisms of Israel; or Malaysia, which dared to hold a court which found Irael guilty of war crimes and genocide, and soon after three of its passenger planes fell out of the sky. French analysts could benefit from studying the British street-theatre terror case of Lee Rigby.

……………………………

Jewish security cars were out in force in London, in wake of Paris attack. following the Kosher store seige: “Based in Stamford Hill, the volunteers are trained by the Metropolitan Police and patrol the area regularly looking for anti-Semitic hate crimes.” They are called ‘Shomrim’ – Hebrew for guards, and don’t seem to need number-plates.

Jewish security cars in london

Blood put on street: Soon after the psy-op street-theatre of a policeman being ‘shot,’ the pavement area was cordoned off, and some ‘blood’ put there – as a journalist explained on Sky News.

Intel-asset ‘Terrorists’The Kouachi brothers and Amedy Coulibaly were well known by French authorities, French intelligence and the CIA. The Kouachis were tracked and monitored—guided—over the course of many years, arrested many times, yet were allowed to continue training and plotting with fellow Al-Qaeda in Iraq, Yemen, Syria, etc – telltale signs of a guided military-intelligence operation.  The lost ID left in getaway car belonged to Said Kouachi (also, they switched cars in front of a local Israeli army centre.) 

Editor of Satire mag ‘Charlie Hebdo’ was Stephane Charbonnier, now allegedly dead: his mag has been producing truly obscene anti-Christian and anti-Muslim cartoons, whereas for anyone who doubted the ‘Holocaust’, he said “I’m for cutting off their balls. No need to waste time discussing”. His girlfriend partner arch-Zionist agent Jeannette Bougrab is a Mizrahi Jew and member of the French Council of State, belonging to Sarkozy’s UMP Party, and has Rothschild connections via ‘Meyer-Brown’. One of the cartoonists in Charlie Hebdo had been sacked for a comparatively innocuous remark, accused of ‘antisemitism’. Charlie Hebdo “was a neocon, philo-Semitic magazine that supported Zionist wars, and was dedicated to otherize minorities and Muslims in particular, while at the same time silencing criticism of Jewish power and the American war machine. Charlie Hebdo went about acting as the Israeli cultural attaché in Paris” – Gilad Atzman. 

Al-Qaeda resuscitates: the Paris ‘terrorists’ are claiming to have been ‘sent’ by ‘Al Qaida of Yemen’.

Russian view: Komsomolskaya Pravda, one of Russia’s leading tabloids, ran the headline: “Did the Americans stage the terror attack in Paris?” and posted a series of interviews on its website that presented various reasons why Washington might have organised the attack. In one interview, Alexander Zhilin, head of the pro-Kremlin Moscow Centre for the Study of Applied Problems, claimed the terror attack was US retribution against President François Hollande for a January 6 radio interview in which Mr Hollande urged the EU to lift sanctions against Russia. Washington used the attacks as “a quick fix for consolidating” US and EU geopolitical interests in Ukraine, Mr Zhilin claimed.

 It worked perfectly…

On 12 January the French Parliament approved with almost unanimity – with one abstention only – the budget for France’s continuous and enlarged involvement in the new war on Iraq, a new war engagement led by Washington and supported by its vassals, UK, Canada, Australia and France. Aircraft carriers and troops were immediately mobilized – not even losing one day. At the same time, French lawmakers agreed to display 10,000 troops throughout the country to protect ‘vulnerable places’ – spying on citizens, for their protection

Truly, this is the shock and awe doctrine. A million and a half took to the streets in Paris this past weekend, the largest manifestation since the liberation of Paris after WWII in 1945. Days after the apparent terror killings in Paris, French President Francois Hollande made one of many emotive speeches that week proclaiming the supposed virtues of Western values – while on board the aircraft carrier Charles De Gaulle. The largest vessel in the French fleet was then deployed to join NATO forces in the Persian Gulf to step up bombing campaigns in Syria and Iraq “to defeat terrorism”

Sweeping new anti-terror moves are being approved by US and UK governments in the wake of the Paris event. For example, teachers at schools and universities will be expected to be able to “identify children at risk of being drawn into terrorism and challenge extremist ideas which can be used to legitimize terrorism and are shared by terrorist groups.”

Charlie Hebdo: A Fictional Attack

An analsys by Sandra Barr shows that two phoney attacks upon the Charlie Hebdo office have been perpetrated, in 2011 and 2015, each time rescuing it from financial disaster, both blamed upon Muslims. No evidence of staff working in the allegedly blown-up office has been given. Its quite likely the allegedly-dead office staff relocated to Peru – after making a huge fortune by printing seven million copies of their  mag on 13.1.15.

Chronology

address  1. 44 Rue Turbigo 75003 – CH were resident there from 2007, until 17.10.11 according to a Paris business directory

2.11.11 – alleged Islamic attack on CH office, at  Address 2:  56-62 Boulevard Davout 75020

Paris Business directory has them leave 2nd Address on 2.11.11, for Address 3:   26 Rue Serpollet  75020 – same building as Head of Police in Paris!

June 2014 CH supposedly moves to Address 4: 10 Nicolas Appert

QUOTE: ‘It would seem that the day before the shooting, January 6, 2015, the staff at CH spent the whole day on Paris business directory sites, changing their address status from Rue Serpollent to Rue Nicholas Appert.’ THEN, ‘Within weeks of the 7.1.15 attack, they announced they had found new premises; their new address is 26 Rue Serpollet.’ (Reminder: Head of police address)

After the 2nd attack, “Apparently, there have never been any pictures of the Charlie Hebdo staff at 10 Rue Nicolas Appert.” http://aanirfan.blogspot.co.uk/2015/02/charlie-hebdo-and-peru.html  – all from 44 Rue Turbigo (i.e., from Address 1, not Address 4)

Sandra Barr (Irish) Suggests that CH office never resided at addresses 2 or 4. Adds, ‘Their stupid magazine was juvenile, vulgar, and offensive to anyone anywhere that had any religious beliefs. (except Jews)”

http://www.panamza.com/ –  The summer before the 7.1.15 street-theatre ‘attack’ a group of the CH staff went to Peru and have various connections there. It is suggested that allegedly-dead staff members may now be over there and very well-paid.

By December 2004 CH was 2000,000 in debt (Wiki). then on 13th January next issue of CH appeared and sold seven million copies, = 20 million euros. Comparison: just prior to the 2.11.11 attack, CH were in financial difficulties, were half a million in the red, then after the attack they were soon in the black.. Their November 2011 issue was pretty much entirely an attack upon Islam, being as offensive as possible, then they attacked their own office and blamed it on  islamic fundamentalists with no evidence whatever – and were soon back in the black.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Share