Ole Dammagard has given a shocking talk to the Open Minds conference in Copenhagen, about what happened in Norway – on 22.7.11 with 77 dead (starts 1o minutes into this video, or to 23 minutes if you are in a hurry, or see short version). Ole’s website is lightonconspiracies.com/ – he knows a frightening amount about these matters. He has written the definitive book about who bumped off Olaf Palme, Sweden’s dove-of-peace Prime Minister. Ole has also given an interview on the subject with ‘super-spook’ Chip Tatum, who really does know about the Empire’s death-squads, etc. (or Here, click ‘Chip Tatum’ and then ‘Ole’)
While Corbyn’s success represents a hugely popular shift within British political thinking, the orchestrated Jewish campaign against him is there to suggest that once again, Jews set themselves against the people they dwell upon.
The vastly growing popularity of Jeremy Corbyn amongst Brits can be easily explained. Following decades of cultural Marxist, divisive Identiterian politics and Zionist-Neocon domination within the British Left, Corbyn brings along a refreshing ideological alternative. Corbyn seems to re-unite the Brits. He cares for the weak. He opposes interventionist wars. He represents the return of the good old left as opposed to New Labour’s affinity with big money, choseness and exceptionalism. He cares for the students and the youth. He thinks about the future and promises to undo the damage created by Blair and Cameron. But as Britain sees the rise of a hugely popular ideological movement, many Jewish institutions see Corbyn as an arch enemy. They would prefer to see him gone and have used nearly every trick in the book to discredit him.
July 30th – Chelmsford Magistrates’ Court , Chris Spivey found guilty – and vilified by the national media. Guilty of what? See my letter (below) handed in to the Minitry of Justice on August 12th.
Spivey had earlier put out the statement: “The court case is going ahead tomorrow despite my Barrister stating in writing that I cannot get a fair trial without the witnesses there. Apparently the judge has refused to postpone the case despite the appeal being put in to have the witnesses present… That should tell you what the outcome of this Kangaroo Court will be. The bottom line is that this is a fraudulent court case and the rule of law completely ignored” continue reading…
Did America go to the Moon in the 1960s?
Hardly anyone I meet these days seems to believe it.
The few people I meet who do still believe it, addmit that the photos we were shown of astronauts on the moon were somehow fiddled or doctored.
I did a chapter in Jim Fetzer’s new ‘conspiracy’ book entitled “And I suppose we didn ‘t go to the Moon either?” My chapter argued that, yes they did really go! continue reading…
At a quarter past ten on July 7th, 2005, BBC news had its reporter Anna O’Neill reporting, on the very first eyewitness account of what had just happened in Tavistock Square. She described how she had just been shown some film of the bus blowing up! No-one else ever saw that film, it has vanished from the historical record. The bus blew up at a quarter to ten. Let’s quote her words.
The John Gaunt Show on BBC-London has its reporter Anna O’Neill at King’s Cross
Good morning, Anna (N.B., this whole sequence extends from 1 hour 18:30 minutes, to 1 hr 21 minutes).
One man has shown her some footage that he recorded on his mobile phone.’of a bus exploding a few streets away’ – some ‘very devastating scenes there, it looks like people lying on the floor’ – she does not say ‘dead.’
John Gaunt returns her to the bus account at 1:19:40 – saying, ‘It was in Russell Square, I believe?’ Anna replies ‘The man himself wasn’t sure’ – he did not know if it was Russell Square or not [it wasn't]. ‘HE SAW THE BACK OF THE BUS EXPLODE’ He had spent some time in Israel. It reminded him of scenes he had witnessed while living over there – i.e. he is implying to the reporter, that this is ‘Islamic terror.’
John Gaunt asks for clarifying of what exactly she saw on the footage. Did she see the bus exploding? She could see ‘THE BACK OF THE BUS WHICH HAD ALL SORTS OF SMOKE AND FLAMES COMING OUT OF IT’ No-one else ever described that. He (the unnamed photographer) had captured ‘THE SECOND AFTER THE BUS HAD EXPLODED.’ continue reading…