Suddenly, Al-qaeda is finished, it won’t do any more as the universal bogeyman. And why not? Because, wanting to invade Syria, Obama encountered the problem of marines objecting to fighting with Al-Qaeda against Assad.
So, could some other bad guys be brewed up? ISIL or ISIS started to appear. This name had the advantage of tying the word ‘Islam’ directly to ‘terrorism’ as in ‘Islamic State.’ Its being used as excuse to invade Syria, plus also to facilitate the division of Iraq into three countries. This fake terror threat group has an occult Egyptian references Isis = mother of Horus. (See http://www.zengardner.com/10-signs-isis-scripted-psyop ). America is now re-bombing Iraq, and plans to start to bomb Syria.
The leader of ISIL is Al-Baghdadi aka Simon Eliot or rather Elliot Shimon, who has a Jewish mother and father, and is a Mossad agent: thank you Edward Snowden.
See Peter Hitchins in the Mail on Britain going into yet another war: ‘Dragged into a war by clowns who can’t even run a railway.’
For years I have kept clear of this subject.
My book Terror on the Tube about the London bombings gave a minimal role to Israeli agents, by way of manipulating the surveillance and security companies (ICTS, Verint Systems, etc), operating on the London Underground, that were clearly Israeli-owned.
It described Netenyahu’s apparent foreknowledge of the event, but drew no conclusions from it.
However things have now changed with a former Mossad agent more or less admitting, in a slip of the tongue, that they did it: while discussing an explosive maybe used in the London bombings, Juval Aviv says: “its easy to put a truck bomb as we did… as happened in London.” All comments below that video accepted that he had made an admission, of Mossad perpetrating the London Bombings.
Mr Aviv was the Mossad counter-terror agent described by George Jonas in his novel, Vengeance: The True Story of an Israeli Counter-Terrorist Team (1984) and the central character in the Spielberg film about this. He has a book, Staying Safe. continue reading…
Is Israel making the Gaza tunnels, in order to enter Gaza and fire rockets back at Israel – to justify its progressive obliteration of Gaza? Thereby they fulfil their Mossad motto, ‘By way of deception shall you wage war.’ Consider:
Jim Stone observed:- how could such rockets be made?
In the effort to get a stunning psy-op, Israel missed a couple salient points: The import restrictions on Gaza were so tight that there was no way to get the type of paint the rockets were painted with, which made their manufacture as presented completely impossible. Additionally, the border accesses were so closely regulated that there was no way to get any sort of rocket propellant into Gaza, and if you think you can do that with drain cleaner I beg to question what group you hung out with in High School. The chemistry just is not there, what is being launched from Gaza is a finely produced product using high performance materials that Palestinians have no access to, and has ballistics which may appear crude but are yet again impossible without some form of decent engineering and manufacturing which the Palestinians do not have ANYWHERE
Israel rules Gaza with more than an iron fist. All access points are SO controlled that often fewer than 30 people per day or less will get through one because the inspections are so thorough. There is simply NO WAY to smuggle things in and out of Gaza. Israel controls Gaza entirely. This means that no bullets, no guns, no explosives, no rocket propellant, no raw materials that can add up to the preceeding, NOTHING AT ALL gets into Gaza to do rockets with, it would be far easier to find a way to get a gun in and the number of bricks thrown proves even that does not ever happen
The Malaysian government is pressing charges that the Ukranian government in collusion with NATO shot down the Malaysian MH-17 aircraft over Ukraine (August 6th). We here explore this.
Was it shot down by a couple of Su-25 jet fighter planes? On the day of the shootdown, July 17th, Kiev government officials insisted that, “No military aircraft were available in the region,” clearly untrue as various sources have confirmed the Su-25 Ukrainian Fighter jets on radar, trailing MH17 at the same altitude, some 4km behind it.
Even OSCE officials (Organisation for Security and Co-operation in Europe) have (on July 31) confirmed evidence for bullets shot through the cockpit of the plane. (See large PDF of the bullet-holes here.) They are agreeing with aerospace expert Peter Haisenko. We here note four points from him:
”Now I’m going to test your numerology skills by asking you to think about the magic seven …Most of you will know that seven is quite a number” speech by Christine Lagarde, President of IMF on 15 January 2014
“eyewitnesses in the Donetsk region saw Ukrainian warplanes near the passenger jet. They say they heard sounds of powerful blasts and saw a Ukraine warplane shortly before the crash. (ITAR Tass)”
This info comes from a Kiev air traffic controller who is Spanish but working in the Ukraine. continue reading…
The People’s Voice online TV station started up 25th November and ran for four months. A large room at Stonebridge Park (near Wembley) was rented for £300 a week. I was invited there a few times to be interviewed and join discussion programs. It was a big thrill to meet David Icke again and he remembered me – from long ago when we were both in the Green Party. One would see maybe a couple of dozen happy-looking folk working there,
Its funding started with a breathtaking total raised by voluntary donations of £471k – plus £16 k advertising, equals £487k total. http://www.thepeoplesvoice.tv/financial-report-2014/ - nearly five times what Icke had originally appealed for. Last year, remember, he had appealed for a hundred grand. How did that money get spent? This account reports that TPV paid out a cool £205k for ‘direct subcontractors’ and gives no further explanation – was that wages given to workers? This account is from June 2013 to 31st January 2014. As TPV started up on November 25th 2013, we are here talking about a couple of month’s work.
This is an online TV station, just one web-page, one URL – and it just put out films of talking heads, done mainly in its studio. continue reading…
In 1946 the British were still in political control of Palestine, formerly ruled by the Ottomons, under an arrangement created in the wake of World War I and approved by the League of Nations in 1923.
The Zionist movement, led primarily by Jews from Eastern Europe, was determined to drive the British out and terrorism of all sorts—assassinations, kidnappings, bombings, extortion, etc.—was at the very core of the effort.
The problem with the British was that they were carrying out their commitment under the Balfour Declaration far too conscientiously. As a means of gaining support from world Jewry, especially in the United States and Russia, against their enemies in World War I, which included the Ottomon Empire, the Balfour Declaration endorsed the idea of a Jewish home (not the Zionist objective of a ‘homeland’ or ‘state’) in Palestine (still at that time under Ottomon control), ‘it being clearly understood that nothing [would be] done which [would] prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine (still at that time under Ottomon control).
The Zionists wanted massive Jewish immigration from Europe and total political control of Palestine, with the apparent eventual goal of supplanting the entire non-Jewish population from the area. Such policies would certainly have been—and have been—prejudicial in the extreme toward the rights of the locals, and the British refused to institute them, incurring the murderous wrath of the terrorist Stern Gang, which counted future Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Shamir (born Icchak Jeziernicky) among its leaders and its brother in terror, Irgun, one of whose leaders was future Prime Minister Menachem Begin (born Mieczysław Biegun). Why British government officials, and Foreign Secretary Ernest Bevin in particular, would have been targeted for killing by the Zionist terrorists can be well appreciated by reference to Bevin’s Wikipedia page.
Although the attempted assassinations in Britain were unsuccessful, the terror campaign against the British worked. The British gave up their mandate and turned the whole question of Palestine’s future over to the United Nations to decide. Under heavy pressure from the United States, the majority of the UN General Assembly voted to partition Palestine into Jewish and non-Jewish sectors. This final arrangement, according to Bevin, was “…so manifestly unjust to the Arabs that it is difficult to see how we could reconcile it with our conscience.”
This is a comment on http://www.israelandstuff.com/israels-rights-spelled-clearly where it is claimed that Israel (a) has a legal right to exist, and (b) has a right to hugely enlarged national boundaries.
I here argue that Israel’s righto exist is based on force and de facto occupation, achieved though tactics of terror.
This is being composed on Easter Sunday.
Nazis back in Power
The coup-inspired Ukrainian government, recognized by the Western powers, includes several members of explicitly Nazi organizations, including two leaders who have distinguished themselves by fabricating false images of violence and torture aimed to convince Western public opinion of the cruelty of the democratically elected president, Viktor Yanukovych.
On March 6th President Obama passed an Executive Order banning anyone critical of US Ukraine policy from entering the US, phrased as “actions or policies that undermine democratic processes or institutions in Ukraine.” This does not allude to the Nazi skinhead thugs who have seized power in Kiev by NATO-backed bloody violence.
Independence Square, Kiev, February 20th
There is a very old conspiracy theory that seems to be resurfacing. A couple of years ago, Ringo Starr was interviewed and said, twice, that he was the last of the Beatles: ‘I am the last remaining Beatle.’ (26.5.11) The ‘Plastic Macca’ website here is by Tina Foster: she was interviewed by Andrew Johnson on the topic, ‘Was Paul McCartney replaced in 1966?’ - here.
Just last week, Jim Fetzer did a two-hour interview with Clare Kuehn on the subject (‘the Real Deal with Jim Fetzer’), which is quite important, and you might want to peruse some of the four hundred comments about it here, probably the most informed debate on the topic yet. Some of you might remember Clare for the excellent lecture she gave at the Vancouver 911 truth conference in Toronto. continue reading…