The new, 3rd edition of my book is now available.  Amazon is selling it at  only £11.18, plus £2.80 post and package. Don’t buy it from any UK shops – they will ask £22!

That low price uses a UK print-on-demand printer, and Amazon’s ‘The Book Depository’ - but you don’t need to worry about that. That’s the best way to get this book, from a Californian publisher!

At 326 pages, this is fully updated with all of the 7/7 Inquest material. It is THE book on the 2005 London bombings – there is no other! continue reading…

A New Motto for NATO

After Libya, maybe NATO needs a motto, to help give it a sense of direction: now that it has left behind the old-fashioned North Atlantic Treaty of 1949, formerly the basis of its existence. How about something like,

‘It is from Us that the all-embracing Terror proceeds’

- from Article 9 of the Protocols of Zion. continue reading…

Is The War On Terror A Hoax?

By Paul Craig Roberts

September 30, 2011 “Information Clearing House” –  In the past decade, Washington has killed, maimed, dislocated, and made widows and orphans millions of Muslims in six countries, all in the name of the “war on terror.” Washington’s attacks on the countries constitute naked aggression and impact primarily civilian populations and infrastructure and, thereby, constitute war crimes under law. Nazis were executed precisely for what Washington is doing today.

Moreover the wars and military attacks have cost American taxpayers in out-of-pocket and already-incurred future costs at least $4,000 billion dollars–one third of the accumulated public debt–resulting in a US deficit crisis that threatens the social safety net, the value of the US dollar and its reserve currency role, while enriching beyond all previous history the military/security complex and its apologists. continue reading…

 Please sign the appeal to get Tony Farrell re-employed- put up by Rory Ridley-Duff on the big-hitting site www.change.org. Professor Ridley-Duff is employed by the University of Sheffield. (NB, my article about Tony Farrell, and his legal struggle)

Also if you can, contribute to the Tony Farrell Fund Appeal fund. He needs our help. continue reading…

Ian is Britain’s Number One speaker on ‘deep politics.’ Don’t miss what is bound to be a classic presentation – at the Indian YMCA round the back of Goodge Street, off Tottenham Court Road in London. This is THE place to be for your 10th anniversary of 9/11 treat. Friday, 7 pm – on 9.9.11.

continue reading…

22/7/11

- 77 dead -

Was Anders Breivic (AB) a Zionist, who massacred the children in response to Norway’s anti-Israel stance? Or, did he do it for the reason he stated, namely that too many Muslims were flooding into Norway?  

The media have taken the latter view, while some eg Adrian Salbucci, have taken the former.

Norway’s Labour party had passed resolutions on this matter just a day or two before. The day before the event, “Norway’s Foreign Minister was met with claims that Norway must recognize a Palestinian state when he visited the Labour Youth League summer camp: The Palestinians must have their own state, the occupation must end, the wall must be demolished and it must happen now, said the Foreign Minister to cheers from the audience.” As Breivik and his fellow operative made their way onto Utøya Island, the teenage Labor Youth activists “were chanting for BDS (Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions) against Israel.” continue reading…

Appeal against unfair dismissal by Tony Farrell: Sheffield Employment Tribunal, 7th-9th September – his case was dismissed. South Yorkshire police argued that ‘conspiracy therory’ was none of their business.

NEW: discussion of the Tony Farrell case on top UK police blog.

Tony Farrell had been employed for twelve years as ‘Principle Intelligence Analyst’ for South Yorkshire Police, 13^th largest of the 44 police forces in the UK. His job involved producing a yearly ‘Strategic Threat Assessment Matrix’ to determine how the police force had to prioritise its activities. Assessed ‘threats’ ranged from ASBOs (anti-social behaviour orders) to the terrorist threat allegedly presented by Islamic extremists. Having a statistics degree, it was his job to translate the different ‘strategic threats’ into a ‘matrix’ of relative numerical weighted probabilities.

In 2010, one week before the 5^th anniversary of 7/7, Tony (who had never previously doubted government versions of events) stumbled across ‘9/11 Truth’ material on the web. Like so many millions before him, he was shocked to the core by this experience. He quickly realised that there was a great mass of evidence relating to 9/11 kept hidden by the mainstream media. As a Christian, Tony consulted his church minister, who suggested that he consider, whether the same might be true for the London 7/7 bombings? continue reading…

On the morning of July 7th, did the alleged bombers flee from King’s Cross to Canary Wharf – where they were gunned down? Did that really happen? An episode of the intrepid Richard Hall’s Sky TV (June 3rd) “Rich Planet” examined new evidence confirming this, and the likely route they took  (See 10-15 minutes into his program). It used testimony of a young man who was on the Thameslink line going South from Luton to Gatwick via King’s Cross that morning, and who experienced a load of anti-terror police activity at Gatwick at 10 o’clock. continue reading…

At 4pm on Thursday 12^th May at Southwark Crown Court the jury returned and declared Muad’Dib (Anthony John Hill) innocent of attempting to ‘pervert the course of justice’.

Mr. Hill has spent 151 days incarcerated in Wandsworth prison over the past few months and this verdict spared him, mercifully, a sentence of up to 20 years in jail.

His offence? He had sent six DVD copies of his film ‘7/7: The Ripple Effect’ to various persons at the time (in 2008) of the trial in Kingston of three ‘terror’ suspects, alleged co-conspirators with the London ‘suicide bombers’. The DVD’s were intercepted and never reached their targets. The Kingston suspects were found innocent (only to later be retried for the same offences, but that’s another story). continue reading…

 Five years after the event, we have a judgement from Britain’s High Court:

• The 7/7 killings were ‘unlawful.’  Uh-huh.
• Nobody was to blame, except the wicked Four who are dead.
• A public enquiry into 7/7 would not be a good idea.
• There is no need for an Inquest into the Four alleged perpetrators.
• No ‘conspiracy’ would have been possible

We should here remind ourselves, as to the proper purpose of an inquest.

An inquest is meant to come to a judgement concerning cause of death.

In the very strange circumstances of the 7/7 Inquest, Lady Justice Hallett could not do this because no post-portems had been performed upon the 52 dead bodies. continue reading…