Did a huge lorry drive into a beach crowd, gathered to honour ‘Bastille day’ in the town of Nice?

According to The Times of July 16th, the mad lorry driver drove 1.1 miles along the Promenade des Anglais by the beach, starting at 10.25 pm until it finally halted at 10.50 pm. Okay, that is two miles per hour.

We’re always hearing about how good French math teaching is supposed to be compared to ours, but it seems even with a simple State Fabricated Terror event like this they can’t do it, telling us the lorry was hurtling along at 40 mph or maybe 25 mph.

They’d had enough practice after all – on April 21st a massive anti-terror drill went on around the Cannes film festival, which managed to frighten visitors, then on June 8th a massive mock terror drill was rehearsed in Lyon, with two thousand people involve – ahead of a big football match.

All that drilling ensures that something is going to happen.

The next day, a frightening video of the ‘dead bodies’ appeared, with dolls all over the street:



We note that Pamela Gellar, whose site hosted it, is an arch-Zionist living in America.  www.veteranstoday.com/2015/05/06/zionist-whore-pamela-geller-oh-boy/ 

See her ‘Atlas shrugs’ logo at the top of the page.

Her source for the video was given as ‘Jester on Twitter’ which sounds rather odd and not very French.

Are the casualties here shown dummies,  and is the blood the wrong colour? We note how the dummy in the blue trousers, is lying down on its back.

Blood does have that colour for the first several minutes – but then it darkens.

Then again, this one has to be a dummy  Dummy

All the bodies were quite evenly spread out – in the middle of the road.

That ‘Promenade des Anglais’ by the seaside had plenty of room for pedestrians to escape – either into the sea or into side-streets. Yes it was a big festival, but would people really be standing in the middle of the road, at night-time? And would they stay there as a huge white lorry drives towards them? Rows of trees separate the pavement from the road (see first link, above, scroll down).

The Daily Mail said the killer ‘mounted pavements at high speed and ploughed through crowds’ – so why are we looking at corpses in the middle of the road?

Videos do show the huge lorry driving along the road – but not hitting anything. Nor do we see it trying to climb up on the pavement.

The next morning (15th) the news reported 77 dead, then that soon became 84.   

These are rather obviously multiples of seven – plus the event happened on 14/7.  

This is France’s Independence day, ‘Bastille day’. 

Lifelike dummies are easy to buy http://www.lifetec.com.au/mass%20casualty.htm

The lorry-driver killer is conveniently shot dead:Mohamed Lahouiaej Bouhiel. He was a ‘career criminal’ well-known to the police, so how come he managed to hire a huge lorry? He was ‘shot dead by the police in the cab of his truck’ so did he stop the vehicle first and then they shot him? In March a few months earlier he had been jailed for arms offences so it seems  odd that he was allowed to own guns. He rented the huge van on July 11th (11/7), should not this have aroused some suspicion?


Here we see ‘bullet holes’ on one side of the lorry window, after it has stopped – none would have hit the driver.

Therewas NO independent cellphone coverage, nor photos by people looking out from their balconies, as many would have been doing on Bastille day. No paramedics appear on the scene – just the usualo blankets covering the bodies.

Here  (at 21 minutes) is CNN interviewing one single witness, and all she says is:

*  It happened right after the fireworks were over (for Bastille Day)

*  She was at home, and looking out of her window she saw ‘so many people on the ground’ – then she heard gunfire. Then,

*  ‘I don’t understand how he went through because the road was blocked’ – end of interview. That’s all!

Are you convinced?

         Here, we see nobody wounded and no blood –


        Here is a tweet of a dead body on the road – no drop of blood, plus a doll added for ‘pathos’.


Here you can see the big lorry, no drop of blood on it or anywhere around it.


Here’s one more – no blood or bodies:



The dome in the background belongs to Le Negresco, a hotel on the Promenade Anglais. The lorry is in the grounds of the nearby Musée Masséna, its not on the road! (Thanks to Don Bowman for this detective work, using Google maps)

The man identified as the lorry driver is alive and well and living in Tunisia: ” Mohamed Lahouaiej Bouhlel serait vivant et témoigne de Tunisie, de Sousse plus exactement, affirmant ne pas être le coupable du massacre !” – he says he didn’t do it! He was in a different country, South of the Mediterranean. He wonders how the authorities got his name mere hours after the event. Does that remind you of the list of 9/11 hijackers, which were stolen identities? (See also here for different fictional identities of ‘truck driver’)

 “The character was not a religious fundamentalist  of any type” and he “led a normal life integrated into mainstream society” as was well observed by Salman Hossain, writing on the Henry Makow site. (20.6.16)

The online French paper which revealed this was Le Libre Penseur.  

See here for an expose by an experienced former CIA operative, showing the totally theatrical nature of the event.

Comment on the news reports, by I.F.:     ‘What would you expect it to be reporting when there was a huge massacre in a public place, at the end of a festive meeting with lots of people around, probably with television cameras and lots of mobile phones? I’d expect lots of blood, lots of ambulances, lots of bodies, lots of wounded people staggering away. We saw none of that. Instead we saw a lorry moving slowly along the street, then suddenly speed up. Then lots of people running *along* the street. If a lorry is charging along what direction do you run in? Do you try to outrun it?’

CCTV in Nice – ‘Nice Systems’ the company running CCTV in  Nice has its headquarters in Tel Aviv.

Mossad Did It

Richard Gutjahr, the man who filmed the drama is a German gentile married  to Mossad asset and Knesset member Einat Wilf, left. Wilf is a member of Ehud Barak’s breakaway HaAtzma’ut or Independence Faction in the 18th Knesset. She served as a lieutenant with the IDF’s ‘Shmoneh Ma’atayim’ or Unit 8-200 in signals intelligence and decryption, etc. I guess he was there ‘to document the event’ to coin a phrase. Mr Gutjahr testified, “‘I stood on the balcony, right on the Promenade des Anglais, and saw how people celebrated there, and how suddenly a truck drove through the crowd.” yeah, sure you did.

On a balcony, at the Westminster hotel – he films it!

Then, the same Richard Gutjahr turns up at the Munich shooting six days later. He happens to film it – it is he whom the Munich TV station interviews as a witness! Just as he’d been interviewed before as a winess to the Nice non-event. He may have taken original footage ‘opposite the McDonalds’ in Munich, before any shooting began.

Let’s give the last word to Kevin Barrett here – ‘Mossad photographer Richard Gutjahr was pre-positioned in both Nice AND Munich! Talk about chutzpah …’

No Real Deaths?

Its the same old st0ry – ” Missing individuals found alive and well include the couple John Torsrud and Heidi Niederer and the young adult Dylan Barbonia. Victoria Savchenko turned into a Facebook Celebrity the day after the attacks but there are no other accounts of her in social media.  In fact, none of the alleged casualties/victims have any verified user accounts on social media. In some cases, pictures were ripped off other accounts and plastered on websites with fabricated names. Then the relatives of the non-existent casualties/victims are clearly doing some very bad acting.”

A black girl named Lea named by the Daily Mail as one of the victims was furious – her real name was Adamara Ajuzie, so this was simple identity-theft with a switch of name. Her appearance is distinctive -she’s very beautiful, so the Mail had to apologise!

As Salaman Hossein has rightly concluded, “Most of the people that went missing are either alive or have had fake names and identities attributed to them.”


“On Friday 3 June 2016, the French authorities have organized an international meeting … to relaunch a deadlocked Israeli-Palestinian peace process.” This initiative by France’s Foreign Minister was very commendable – but there was a price to pay for it.  “If we cannot break the deadlock, we are heading for disaster,” he said.

Normally such heavy duty lorries are banned from roads during a national holiday.

Instructions to Destroy CCTV!

On July 20th,the Anti-Terrorism Sub-Directorate (SDAT) sent to agents who manage video surveillance of the city [Nice] requisition citing Articles 53 and L706-24 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and Article R642-1 of the Penal Code erasure asking them to hand over “complete” 24 hours of images from six cameras named, numbered, but also of all the scenes from the beginning of the attack that took place on the promenade des Anglais, on the night of July 14 .

“This is the first time we are asked to destroy evidence,”  a stunned official commented, adding:

The center of CCTV and the city of Nice could be prosecuted for this and also the officers in charge of the device do not have jurisdiction to engage in such operations.  

They want 30,000 hours of CCTV material deleted!

We do not know if giving a destruction order while we are in full backup is not going to curtain the whole system,

a shocked official stated. The newspaper Le Figaro contactd the Paris prosecutor’s office, who confirmed the information and said:

This was done in this case to prevent the uncontrolled and uncontrolled dissemination of these images.

They especially want ” the cameras in direct contact with the event” to have their film deleted. A lawyer for the city of Nice told Nice-Matin that the municipality refuses to meet this demand.

A stressful situation is building op, as these CCTV images will show no trace of any mass-murder attack by a crazed lorry-driver.