He has suffered a lot of pain so I’m not judging him: ‘I have been branded as the Sandy Hooke guy’ and he adds:
‘People don’t know who Adam Lanza is, the guy who killed those kids’
Adam Lanza was a mockup, a photoshopped ‘living nightmare’ character. He DID NOT HAVE real identity.
Here is letter from the irrepressible Jim Fezer – where ‘your client’ is Alex Jones:
Mr. Barnes,
While you enjoy an exceptional reputation, your client’s performance during his deposition was beyond ridiculous. He mentioned me a couple of times, but did not cite the massive evidence I have compiled that proves Sandy Hook WAS the hoax he had originally described it as being.
My edited book, NOBODY DIED AT SANDY HOOK (2015; 2nd edition, 2016), for example has thirteen contributors, including six (current or retired) Ph.D. professors, who concluded that the school had been closed by 2008 and there were no students there. He didn’t even mention it!
We have even proven (in subsequent research) that the kids were fictions made up out of photos of older kids when they were children. The case of “Noah Pozner” is notable, because I even entered an amicus curiae brief in this case to aid and abet your defense (attached). Did you miss it?
For my comments, see: https://terroronthetube.co.uk/related-articles/gun-control-and-sandy-hook/
I’ve got a chapter in this book ‘The 20 Children and their Homes’ which looks at the families. A whole lot of them had their mortgages in Newtown (where it happened) paid off on the same day, just prior to the event. I’ve got one more section in the book, ‘Analogies with the London Bombings’, see below.
#1 | Written by eht--%/%--eht about 5 years ago.Reply
INTEL runs —ALLL—- mass Medea.
There are absolutely NO exceptions.
What’s now exceptional is that we –KNOW– INTEL’s supreme weapon of choice — –
the before birth inverted, under the radar – – –FTM.
You got that right – – WOMEN pretending to be men – – and fisting FAKERY and
derailing TRUE revelation – -in the name of INTEL — – and ‘psy-ants’ and ‘management’
— -by tranny hive USURY.
Just ask Yale in China’s –fave– FTM – – – ‘MAO say DUNG’ !
#2 | Written by Andrew S MacGregor about 5 years ago.Reply
Dear Nick,
Anybody who did even a small study of ‘Sandy Hook’ would realise that it was a police exercise. The really important thing was that there was no murder weapon. All of the shooting was supposedly with an AR-15, except for the suicide of Adam Lanza which was supposedly by a Glock. However the AR-15 was supposedly in the boot of the Honda sedan, and again the police never revealed that, ergo no murder weapon, no murders.
However there was an even more interesting aspect. One of the TV stations interviewed three of the supposed ‘first responders’, all complete in their police uniforms. Nothing unusual there until you come to the Boston Bombing.
At the Boston Bombing the very same three ‘first responders’ are again seen on CCTV fleeing the area, but this time dressed in the ‘black and tan’ costumes. The first question that must come to mind is ‘what were they doing at both scenes and secondly who exactly were they? I’ve formed my conclusions, but that is not the best bit.
One of these three gentlemen was also filmed at the ‘finish line’ when the supposed bombs went off. He was holding a gadget in his right hand.
Infowars told us that this picture was ‘snapped a few moments after the first bomb detonation. Infowars also told us that the device he is holding is an “Inspector Radiation Alert” device that detects radiation from a dirty bomb or nuclear attack.
Please think about this for a moment, as this was a stupendous statement. How could Infowars identify a small handheld device so ‘accurately’? Secondly, what was a ‘Black and Tan’ person doing with such a device? And thirdly, why was a ‘Black and Tan’ so prepared to be carrying a ‘Radiation detection device’ at the finish line of the Boston Marathon?
My conclusion was that the object held was the detonation device, and that Infowars had to know this and thus made the ‘alibi’ for the agent dressed as a ‘Black and Tan’. This makes Alex Jones and his ‘Infowars’ site an Intelligence organisation, and it fits what Webster Tarpley states in regard to such practises.
You really need to look at the situation Alex Jones is in as a regular Infowars viewer he makes it clear that he has numerous lawsuits against him by parents of the victims of this alleged shooting. This is the one big issue that institutionalists from MSM to Democratic Party have against him is that Alex denies it happened.
In a recent interview with CNN he said that all comments he made about denial was because he was feeling the effects of ‘a drugs trip’. This takes the responsibility of blame off him and he was for bringing to the attention on people a DMT hallucigenics network operated by the CIA in his local city of Austin.
